new version of the draft

Tony Li <tli@cisco.com> Fri, 18 December 1992 22:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12899; 18 Dec 92 17:09 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa12893; 18 Dec 92 17:09 EST
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa27542; 18 Dec 92 17:11 EST
Received: from lager.cisco.com by ftp.com with SMTP id AA25007; Fri, 18 Dec 92 17:07:31 -0500
Received: by lager.cisco.com; Fri, 18 Dec 92 14:07:10 -0800
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1992 14:07:10 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Tony Li <tli@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <9212182207.AA12140@lager.cisco.com>
To: kasten@ftp.com
Cc: criteria@ftp.com, kasten@ftp.com
In-Reply-To: (Frank Kastenholz's message of Fri, 18 Dec 92 09:17:26 -0500 <9212181417.AA04363@ftp.com>
Subject: new version of the draft

Your analysis (BTW, very interesting reading, thanks) leaves out the
fact that at the point where we have run out of IPv4 address space, I
can no longer expand my IPv4 "island".  

It also ignores the "momentum factor": if there is demand for IPv7,
more products will be created for IPv7.  IPv4 will be an extra cost
option.  At some point it snowballs and IPv7 becomes the default,
ubiquitous service.

Tony