IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: question

Frank T Solensky <solensky@andr.ub.com> Wed, 27 January 1993 15:43 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04739; 27 Jan 93 10:43 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04733; 27 Jan 93 10:43 EST
Received: from babyoil.ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13094; 27 Jan 93 10:45 EST
Received: from ub-gate.UB.com by ftp.com with SMTP id AA08110; Wed, 27 Jan 93 10:40:56 -0500
Received: from sunny.andr.UB.com (sunny.andr.UB.com) by ub-gate.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1[UB-1.8]) id AA12039; Wed, 27 Jan 93 07:40:40 PST
Received: from fenway.andr.UB.com by sunny.andr.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA17844; Wed, 27 Jan 93 10:40:51 EST
Received: by fenway.andr.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA07688; Wed, 27 Jan 93 10:40:37 EST
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 10:40:37 -0500
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Frank T Solensky <solensky@andr.ub.com>
Message-Id: <9301271540.AA07688@fenway.andr.UB.com>
To: criteria@ftp.com, yakov@watson.ibm.com
Subject: Re: question

>What portion of the total cost of modifying host (either for SIP or for TUBA)
>would be in the items above the Network Layer (e.g. applications) ?

Again, gut feel (and before my first cup of coffee): not a large portion, and
probably not much different between the proposals.  I'd expect that most of
the work would be leveraged off changing the socket library routines: the
apps themselves rarely deal with anything more involved that the socket
number.
								-- Frank

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email