Re: [Crypto-panel] Reviews for 4 PAKEs (PAKE slection process)

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Tue, 11 February 2020 17:49 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A58C12013D for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:49:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lQ0aWZkYoyvI for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22d.google.com (mail-lj1-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D30A120926 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id f25so12560804ljg.12 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:49:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7C/ZChC7Pk69nIAdQHczRzIf10yqr58FWt04L7QXi/c=; b=nIk0QRrFggJ6vDRJQntIFBvchFLLGDR4AjWK4pEYY7FCR34fYfguhlMA5X+fL2yY84 LdBgN1OC6+B2TVxK3MH6V0+ERfdmSttDCnT2lskfMxGR1tXUBCW8JFfjJ44svpxPcXg3 wsSY0+jgWIVBmz3n7DWR+OyCcfQGsYUHPToPg0UJDbOqc9jAVBRRLUU4NC1S1yigb8jv +mm3dM4+vG7QM2/kUJoOmQwnpun7rg9x1Z5Qtdg27GXybpJWSm+4RB+MKJu+VKB0iapr PQPvtrOHqsucmHVdXXWopY93DQgPYta2oxapVudJxQjCvy2emzvOjv9rDN0M/SMQcHed Oe8w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7C/ZChC7Pk69nIAdQHczRzIf10yqr58FWt04L7QXi/c=; b=n6tSEiBWl3lGyAiHrlgQR4KuWEHd6iyVAuXBih2fjQKoWMVyg4By3toFZ2Q9mOxfKD M9OugyEVDkyl7oE54I3cJQzg1ZJY6NRWToyYL/mGvTWRoWuvKVxkBK11BSJAf+r1BT3Z skyLhkKEq6WXzoqGrAdMDwPT5zBHqHastISepctuPGXrfAAUuNu0ujy3iQfwix5QGkwM bfBMtKwIrg+eVK7FKbFn8onfZC9hPnjmoq09F9IPv6WJWk6ESRaNgv7BkPhNQLeyuNiP 4qfd2qzd3zAlcF51eoQ48cDfceU+boGVvT5OmGQ23KmRJwpsfuNcGvdtz5HopX4um90j 9YvQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW7GRb9VikheV0cNBERjbXLn6yUdQeWgUY7WvYSk3Dxjbb0B6dT 2Z96TEiHMXRdrL8BCZ/mG0TMJsnrDyPoOFjGg+Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwUWJDIBkygYofUISb8KlAYAlS0UjUsTaj6oTB6iJzeUgA2ym9SoVvFqtUJrRj0nE56xyVseY3OEydd0eQ9P0U=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8758:: with SMTP id q24mr5044248ljj.157.1581443378641; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:49:38 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6=-BPyYUDXbVi9s+LFfjtPHQmhPs5jyLWpsTm6=ChzrpQ@mail.gmail.com> <7E818D37-B68A-4154-87AC-B2E044371BC6@vigilsec.com>
In-Reply-To: <7E818D37-B68A-4154-87AC-B2E044371BC6@vigilsec.com>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 20:49:27 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6nAv2Cf9Fe3gdN5fDruuxq2d+eXPWR-ucW4nzyRjM26cA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>
Cc: Bjoern Tackmann <bjoern.tackmann@ieee.org>, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>, cfrg-chairs@ietf.org, crypto-panel@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d0fde6059e507a6b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/4_CBVBamN0HwYSoD_j4mqJpNK2Y>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Reviews for 4 PAKEs (PAKE slection process)
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 17:49:43 -0000

Great, many thanks, Russ!

Regards,
Stanislav

вт, 11 февр. 2020 г. в 20:47, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>:

> Yes, I am prepared to update my review based on the updates.
>
> Russ
>
> On Feb 11, 2020, at 1:42 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Crypto Review Panel members,
>
> Due to the plan of the second round of the PAKE selection process, we're
> approaching Stage 4 of Round 2:
>
> *Stage 4: February, 12th - March, 10th*
> *Crypto Review Panel members prepare new overall reviews (for
> all 4 remaining PAKEs) taking into account both the reviews obtained
> on Round 1 and new information obtained during Round 2.*
>
> Let me remind you, that we have 4 candidates passed to Round 2: CPace,
> SPAKE2 (balanced) and AuCPace, OPAQUE (augmented).
>
> The authors of the protocols have provided their answers to the additional
> questions that were asked after IETF 106 meeting (see
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#questions-for-round-2
> ).
>
> Their answers have been provided in the mailing list (see links at
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#answers-on-round-2
> ).
>
> The previous overall reviews by Bjoern Tackmann, myself, Russ Housley and
> Yaron Sheffer are available at
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#overall-reviews-by-crypto-review-panel
> . All other reviews are available here:
> https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection/blob/master/README.md#summary-of-reviews
>
> So now we need reviews (each review should consider all 4 protocols -
> otherwise it will be more difficult to compare) for the remaining
> candidates. The reviews should be done before *March, 10th*.
>
> First of all, it will be very important if *Bjoern, Russ *and *Yaron*
> could do their new (or, better to say, updated) reviews, since they have
> done them at the previous round. It will be great if Scott could
> participate, since he provided very important reviews on certain issues.
> Also since now we have *Chloe, Julia, Karthikeyan, Thomas, Jean-Philippe *and
> *Jon *on board.
> In this process we need as many good reviews as possible, so we ask all of
> you to consider your participation.
>
> Please let us know, whether you are ready to do this, before *February,
> 13th*.
>
> Regards,
> Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG chairs)
>
>
>
>