[Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Mon, 02 December 2019 08:26 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A6A12023E for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 00:26:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wit5Mh0hPsEo for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 00:26:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A64E120154 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 00:26:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id 21so7323777ljr.0 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:26:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S4/WO3dYYNHj/ey92tGrIIBDpuf0qLcneFRga3w+T7U=; b=BczNgv8NsWO4lz1SaX4NzrDyGTXQKqh8B4iM0VzzPdFNOGc8gy4NmJ23t8JdfFv83/ e+k2fKIlTlSIc+0vW5jCLCxKWEsrRdBjOc9+otcdY6kOSOR+bEBy7rYt1ZW74+cHRq1n u63c0c6pz8aaH9FMnxdWscevHwS4sZUydwc2cK9HqCUOcAl5MlCYrWc15I1MLNZ//Psp YqGoKO3WnTjUPjExyFkGeVm3DZCKVNwS3J8Umt8p2uOjEWpVMt1mKWbLK4LZbB0jedkB XrQSgRQ+YDVjCGEq0eRXOqRrhLdr4nBftrHZt3JRy2WdmXO2Sxtwgy8SdPWtlUY63aIA KLoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=S4/WO3dYYNHj/ey92tGrIIBDpuf0qLcneFRga3w+T7U=; b=Y3HY0hPoU5GMutFxEHg2Nvp389Zay/ljK2VBbHhTKPprURxmiauOAA4pwBqSGPiP6B 7Q1w4Do8CLa4U2GYQqZJnNifqkkoZaTZ6jtlFfEC73yrztujPthNN19tpZWJpegjfUSj J4YZmsR6eK75Vdqbe2lp53KzqslJjZumMkbZq9XTndqVjNDS9MqHH69+eeMPQRWEuT1z c/ECD4TBAHDGNErWKBxaVUMMCwgE1Y4D6+Tv8y5Hgtl783ytkiq1orZwBVCVeAs2DbNe MzU+Th4RfntqILDlTOXNk9R2+4zzxjXYn6fJ6Lr2FVc5m/d30S8NZRcM0Li0kYTHJTh4 nioQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXFL79blPJvDOSj1iojS+rlNTv99qrs/V5RYx8wwvEP957EmyMX JhgMCyzbCzNgEtZMCvtKjDsjB+b+Fmmihn5rSaD/xVo2yqU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxEmJpWTvs74m4iCXEetGol3ntr6FR5et1m8oamvqrjddGXSefjpAgnysfEXgoqKcAKkAAqxeyt0kVzUIURWXY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9a55:: with SMTP id k21mr40509005ljj.85.1575275168460; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:26:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 11:25:58 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6mhzze8aEh1mx50Le=LEV8zE5rzS0m047aA_hMKMsbUPA@mail.gmail.com>
To: crypto-panel@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d6f44a0598b45443"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/IZLHOfMfXe3mE8ALQFhHCoqYMdc>
Subject: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 08:26:12 -0000

I would ask to add the following question to be considered during Round 2
of the PAKE selection process - the question which was discussed in the
CFRG mailing list before IETF 106.

To each of the remaining 4 PAKEs:
- Quantum annoyance of the PAKE?
- Post-quantum preparedness of the PAKE?

Best regards,
Stanislav