Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539?

Dear Kenny, Alexey and Yoav,

I'll be happy to help with this one.

If it's ok, I'd prefer to provide the review until the 3rd of February, but
I'm ready to make it faster if it is needed.

Best regards,
Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev, Ph.D.,
Head of Information Security Department,
CryptoPro LLC

2017-01-17 14:16 GMT+03:00 Paterson, Kenny <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>:

> Dear CFRG Review Panel members,
>
> Please could we have a volunteer to review this document from Yoav Nir?
>
> The document is a proposed revision to RFC 7539 ("ChaCha20 and Poly1305
> for IETF Protocols") to address a number of errata that were found in the
> original RFC in a systematic way.
>
> The purpose of the review would be to check that the corrections make
> sense and to try to identify any further glitches that remain. Additional
> remarks would be welcome of course.
>
> If you volunteer, it would be helpful to also indicate a time-scale for
> delivering your review.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kenny
>
> On 12/01/2017 06:24, "Cfrg on behalf of Yoav Nir" <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org
> on behalf of ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Reminder.
> >
> >
> >Is there interest in pushing this forward?
> >
> >
> >Yoav
> >
> >
> >Begin forwarded message:
> >
> >From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
> >
> >Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Rev RFC 7539?
> >
> >Date: 16 November 2016 at 9:09:11 GMT+2
> >
> >To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
> >
> >Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org>
> >
> >
> >Cycles found.
> >
> >
> >Attached please find two files:
> >  1. rfc7539_long.txt is RFC 7539 with page breaks and page numbers
> >removed.
> > 2. draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-00.raw.txt
> > is the unpaginated form of the new draft.
> >
> >
> >Couldn’t do much about the boilerplate, but this makes it easy to compare.
> >
> >
> >Yoav
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 16 Nov 2016, at 10:06, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> >
> >+1 - if you got the cycles.
> >
> >spt
> >
> >
> >On Nov 14, 2016, at 15:55, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
> >
> >This seems like a good plan.
> >
> >-Ekr
> >
> >
> >On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> >Hi
> >
> >RFC 7539 (“ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols”)[1] is now
> >implemented in many places and referenced by 3 RFCs and 8 Internet Drafts
> >([2])
> >
> >However, the quality of the document is not where we’d like it to be.
> >There have been 7 errata filed against it. Most of it is editorial or
> >insignificant, but still no errata is better than some errata.
> >
> >So what do the participants and chairs think about spinning up a quick[4]
> >rfc7539bis that has the same text, except that the errata will be merged
> >in?
> >
> >I think such a document should be fairly easy and quick.
> >
> >Yoav
> >
> >P.S: and yes, of course I’m volunteering to write it.
> >
> >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7539
> >[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7539/referencedby/
> >[3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7539
> >[4] My spell check actually corrected “quick” to “quic”. The contents of
> >my mails are veering far away from regular English.
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Cfrg mailing list
> >Cfrg@irtf.org
> >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Cfrg mailing list
> >Cfrg@irtf.org
> >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>
>