Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539?
"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Tue, 17 January 2017 11:43 UTC
Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F203C129455 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:43:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wGMwdLOOVtaC for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:43:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 874D3129418 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:43:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v23so151792328qtb.0 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:43:41 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=A/kiUx6u8oMv2KdyavUIca54V3cQsyk7ly+CPEL3Zd8=; b=gL0qZyLJYsDJWudXTOiU4c5wrPt7JCrwB46aK+ZMTCEWslHWEhZZqDPetfIHkLY62T q3WgoBaTGpz6Ty2T/IqsQn+HF63nrhrUVFQO5D0ZpdokTiJCMXn1oURjNs71SWG7LORh sdiKJDDqIfAeJi1n3e23JJRDZx537hGiHECGkEV8BRam8h2t4w08W2uA+a0yQ8HrDba/ JB1RCwQaJFB+6m7EX0qOwC8N/IeD0j3Hsc+3DQ2qoBzBT25g4T8jyNQ2jafjK8Wsk0kQ k/48FTWqf8bpt+1kN4PHL2eRbB2SJq7TLSHbEF7y/PIrbyFyLWQXAyyV/qbg4TsuakSB oQlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=A/kiUx6u8oMv2KdyavUIca54V3cQsyk7ly+CPEL3Zd8=; b=aET9qR1QgDEASJvAAqyV3XaIu4XKRJNDzEj9ieQZWzVmSYoFv/SW4g/fnzp2jImEV1 TigTzqPcFVtEbxHlIH9niACkzR/W/mzOw4Mj4qQf40d7CRAxff7JNzEq3yGT8552EoMJ DAhDEyhKbc4r0yUQJIVa9MKAVJEb2B6vk9GZePRoeNwRCznyHzna/P2xOboWfk65FWE6 DSp1neiFUF6WlNr7xp2HuaO1bUWcuiklVtJs/Ox540FFe4quW3wUrFnCQg1ADkUoynRG vTcjwB4a6nq/LLOnlc19UR0DxsE92c9WXAET6UVMfcZDTtJF5hW1NeZjoyigNIye15Dy 3qsw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXI3T76AMbVmzO4czfRYB2kNb1ymdTUiKiwopSrs7a0aYX3hBIBkHqUFpEIAM0iCZqLgUon/0vIbb/JH4A==
X-Received: by 10.55.42.34 with SMTP id q34mr37688001qkh.91.1484653420538; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:43:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.132.102 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jan 2017 03:43:40 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D4A3ABF6.7E151%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
References: <46ECD4D0-07BB-4082-82AC-4B2AE656AE09@gmail.com> <A57288FC-C629-472F-8394-DB58C45EEC25@gmail.com> <D4A3ABF6.7E151%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 14:43:40 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6kebcqwS_z0q-XpU5uYG_F3rVCcRTfeQRr=kAjKVdegvg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114938e6bef530054648cf7e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/IcI1ktHs73P3VZHJO0hni5V12Ug>
Cc: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" <crypto-panel@irtf.org>, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539?
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 11:43:44 -0000
Dear Kenny, Alexey and Yoav, I'll be happy to help with this one. If it's ok, I'd prefer to provide the review until the 3rd of February, but I'm ready to make it faster if it is needed. Best regards, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev, Ph.D., Head of Information Security Department, CryptoPro LLC 2017-01-17 14:16 GMT+03:00 Paterson, Kenny <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>: > Dear CFRG Review Panel members, > > Please could we have a volunteer to review this document from Yoav Nir? > > The document is a proposed revision to RFC 7539 ("ChaCha20 and Poly1305 > for IETF Protocols") to address a number of errata that were found in the > original RFC in a systematic way. > > The purpose of the review would be to check that the corrections make > sense and to try to identify any further glitches that remain. Additional > remarks would be welcome of course. > > If you volunteer, it would be helpful to also indicate a time-scale for > delivering your review. > > Regards, > > Kenny > > On 12/01/2017 06:24, "Cfrg on behalf of Yoav Nir" <cfrg-bounces@irtf.org > on behalf of ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > >Reminder. > > > > > >Is there interest in pushing this forward? > > > > > >Yoav > > > > > >Begin forwarded message: > > > >From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> > > > >Subject: Re: [Cfrg] Rev RFC 7539? > > > >Date: 16 November 2016 at 9:09:11 GMT+2 > > > >To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> > > > >Cc: IRTF CFRG <cfrg@irtf.org> > > > > > >Cycles found. > > > > > >Attached please find two files: > > 1. rfc7539_long.txt is RFC 7539 with page breaks and page numbers > >removed. > > 2. draft-nir-cfrg-rfc7539bis-00.raw.txt > > is the unpaginated form of the new draft. > > > > > >Couldn’t do much about the boilerplate, but this makes it easy to compare. > > > > > >Yoav > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On 16 Nov 2016, at 10:06, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > > >+1 - if you got the cycles. > > > >spt > > > > > >On Nov 14, 2016, at 15:55, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote: > > > >This seems like a good plan. > > > >-Ekr > > > > > >On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 3:32 PM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi > > > >RFC 7539 (“ChaCha20 and Poly1305 for IETF Protocols”)[1] is now > >implemented in many places and referenced by 3 RFCs and 8 Internet Drafts > >([2]) > > > >However, the quality of the document is not where we’d like it to be. > >There have been 7 errata filed against it. Most of it is editorial or > >insignificant, but still no errata is better than some errata. > > > >So what do the participants and chairs think about spinning up a quick[4] > >rfc7539bis that has the same text, except that the errata will be merged > >in? > > > >I think such a document should be fairly easy and quick. > > > >Yoav > > > >P.S: and yes, of course I’m volunteering to write it. > > > >[1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7539 > >[2] https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7539/referencedby/ > >[3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7539 > >[4] My spell check actually corrected “quick” to “quic”. The contents of > >my mails are veering far away from regular English. > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Cfrg mailing list > >Cfrg@irtf.org > >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > >Cfrg mailing list > >Cfrg@irtf.org > >https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel > >
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Russ Housley
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Russ Housley
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Yoav Nir
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Yoav Nir
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Russ Housley
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] Fwd: Rev RFC 7539? Paterson, Kenny