IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 December 2019 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B9D12008F for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:43:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jtaov1TrEvyV for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52d.google.com (mail-pg1-x52d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A020312001A for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2019 16:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id k1so678428pgg.12 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:43:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:references :in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=nl/EIvoluuWiCSjeL6xa4zYjU/M+dJWrgcflkPvTUxM=; b=k8Z22F3CFt1Iy6Qh9Q0GaFP5Ake6VbvxfqnGlXlRgB5rXRqwHo/RNfUJpTuypvYS5D xrCTchEsNex2o+w/4/H4ZKEdZAjUp4M5yQlEhQmmqcY6fJ1K1PcXyS9XUZi2DrJiFFnB QxXwTZgkOQ69AnZbke2KfXvKI5AWjZA23jQxqxfXgd7kjACcLIODcyzlZYQB8t6mMbcj Gr5fvZq/0IG1f+iqrUKPMb5i0v63w6Q7dnxb/xcOTn1zjMnpUwM+41FBTBBzXx4QMF6u 6N1yMban6hKI2E42erjrqEVM0YYJ62cXYvGD14Q5nH1BRl7wFSBdF+GrNDb9rEozsDwx JKnA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id :thread-topic:references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=nl/EIvoluuWiCSjeL6xa4zYjU/M+dJWrgcflkPvTUxM=; b=Fk1d19uyhoth49F+QO/RWUA/UJTfx7atg3w8vUsCfggDco7CIiU3gN5xua1nuG9CbM 6r3MM5vs9+KRCSGugH+72JpJtWGRGil4/IiVYN4oR4y0emKvC3/e0sHiKxoQUz+n6Zdq /9hzbWk4mWZMi7P9ix9yBNgUDnkqNbAK5PbnDxM4BZU+2pmg5VyHXR9DBRnDQVJteji5 /Czg8GjZ5bJzgbAsBi8k4BroyiDIDWqrgEUZEh5br3gtzpzZ/o7AGgHYJwsWpl2pXqVM fYri4X3GprQcEzXwOEXLUDVawJKmDwUxWmmhod17wHECqAGUgGKfwb/OdK4jGSV0/ggl FMUw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXsjPVIWtpaZed+REFPj7He88kGLl+TKxby+q7VyRNezGCAjGZa Y7I764Z//WU2NDzSjksWqqA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzAnG/y1vuYveBcgulnpr31fONqdooKlnKtXyq2kc93yqlbVQ2RBSFutIlXW4PEg07o0zplNQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:f94d:: with SMTP id g13mr1761759pfm.60.1575333809060; Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:43:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.28.48.96] (pub-corp-162-8.intuit.com. [207.207.162.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a19sm708287pfn.144.2019.12.02.16.43.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:43:27 -0800 (PST)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.1f.0.191110
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2019 16:43:27 -0800
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
To: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>, crypto-panel@irtf.org
Message-ID: <FC4F267F-3254-4E7C-AE15-C9408CF3CCCE@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2
References: <CAMr0u6mhzze8aEh1mx50Le=LEV8zE5rzS0m047aA_hMKMsbUPA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMr0u6mhzze8aEh1mx50Le=LEV8zE5rzS0m047aA_hMKMsbUPA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3658149807_142803354"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/NplB4m8-odn5o3GkE4ToCp_ZTB0>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:43:32 -0000

Hi Stanislav,

 

Can you please add a definition of “quantum annoyance”, or let me know if you concur with my definition: “an attacker with a quantum computer needs to

   solve [one or more] DLP per password guess.” 

 

Thanks,

                Yaron

 

From: Crypto-panel <crypto-panel-bounces@irtf.org> on behalf of "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Monday, December 2, 2019 at 00:26
To: <crypto-panel@irtf.org>
Subject: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2

 

I would ask to add the following question to be considered during Round 2 of the PAKE selection process - the question which was discussed in the CFRG mailing list before IETF 106.

 

To each of the remaining 4 PAKEs:

- Quantum annoyance of the PAKE?

- Post-quantum preparedness of the PAKE?

 

Best regards,

Stanislav

_______________________________________________ Crypto-panel mailing list Crypto-panel@irtf.org https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email