Re: [Crypto-panel] Requests for review: draft-krovetz-ocb-wideblock and draft-krovetz-rc6-rc5-vectors

Alexey:

There has been considerable discussion of IPR-related topics for OCB mode.  I think that the IRSG or the GFRG Chairs need to give the crypto panel guidance on this topic before a review of that document takes place.

Russ

> On Mar 13, 2019, at 2:32 PM, Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear Crypto Panel members,
> 
> Independent Stream Editor asked for reviews of the following 2 documents:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krovetz-ocb-wideblock/
> .....and...
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krovetz-rc6-rc5-vectors/
> 
> .....in the Independent Stream.
> 
> These are both currently in expired state, but available in the archive.
> 
> If you can do a high level review first, that would be great. ISE is looking for one of the following responses:
> 
> 1) this is a good idea and should be taken by CFRG
> 2) this is a good idea and should be published in the Independent Stream
> 3) this is a good idea, but needs some fixes
> 4) this is not a good idea and should not be published.
> 
> (If you don't know the practical difference between 1) and 2), that is Ok.)
> 
> Thank you,
> Alexey
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel