Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08.txt
Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 29 October 2017 16:16 UTC
Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA1513F5BC for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:16:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZH_6UP-hgxq7 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x231.google.com (mail-pg0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B52113F5B9 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x231.google.com with SMTP id a192so9295816pge.9 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:16:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cf08aRxoLYAe0hOhDArq+bsGZCdIYAYfQN7i5Qv7A5c=; b=sjor+jz+9l6pePWg5FNOELDW+lhRGek7DyAG26inkVT17LCTeAqnBkJI5OnOLvoQ66 WaiUBbd5+Y5IQRmsRgw3CEBt2DsMATfgQ7EC53Rhmr9iS04AYCnFNN7JBM4b1haTGeua Mwnvi2KW5J347BhDZHDxEK9CyD1CWdKab/hZBFWPNevWdeJrKqU5kZwizFBqsoTsmvq2 Pg2X3Z1Gbz4eAKXovyD1TqQPBNFKEMkLPRsu+A8N7FEqgQ+5xKbx/ybO8vSV0L2RnSG4 dUbAljJIX4Dh2SCe5oqXLqVueiCrbwEdtMJWLHsciLR4Yhsywd6K652SrlhxKKoy37ng 0aYA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=cf08aRxoLYAe0hOhDArq+bsGZCdIYAYfQN7i5Qv7A5c=; b=LJeo6zw/CbzHQRMvmSzD6e++TWAQM4DaR3O7tf5q8na79alQ93AVvTHPHz+3t42ke9 UDoITUIINSkXCkfqrUDjaDtYwau2HcQH/aWRka9+BJ8EulmRh3OxyDycrAWLXoqXXDwx ysfYH4bhmY9uZpE33uIbATaJ/HsGeggKUmi7qKRKiuCTlZNAd5FZv6DVthDkhmWiugiH tQNCWoaIDQyBcsTPMLgYPbFTTy6Bnre8B1CKXIn/8DNM4FUyIkbqc6HPraZxo5AREGZn yUVq8qYV3nX5rfIMLM9eNrLSSA40zebNl/fsEwtNF2MMOmNShzrrKKDhz5SBd5OzK9DF LIzg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaWgQN5cQ4Eg7Wjf8NJGfNiIOiw0OGrFGupSZyTF1ikfsMFM5Bcu Yi39O4opx4/S6KCMOb7Ocn8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RKOfIWCQ6rTaeTCTZr5PejyUB5qegFnEWutZwP5wBNOzFKVFj4dTar4H7j89A906m7/ahnjw==
X-Received: by 10.98.147.23 with SMTP id b23mr6298371pfe.5.1509293808568; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.18.129.55] (bzq-202-11.red.bezeqint.net. [212.179.202.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z76sm24612637pfi.117.2017.10.29.09.16.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 29 Oct 2017 09:16:48 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Paterson, Kenny" <Kenny.Paterson@rhul.ac.uk>, "crypto-panel@irtf.org" <crypto-panel@irtf.org>
Cc: "alexey.melnikov@isode.com" <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
References: <150755980208.18384.2936406403472477741@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMr0u6kN1HN7mgfXfuPB2=39C_b_eNs-2igsAWokTKMC9FLCpg@mail.gmail.com> <D61BAD4B.A2D74%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <0c6efc8d-b50b-d9c1-bb3b-c0c7c02feb53@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 18:16:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D61BAD4B.A2D74%kenny.paterson@rhul.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/SUuJbCHC0P2Dl2Ok_gA525gmAKY>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08.txt
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 16:16:51 -0000
Hi Kenny, I can take this one, but it will be more than a few days. What is the time expectation? Thanks, Yaron On 29/10/17 18:08, Paterson, Kenny wrote: > Dear CFRG panel members, > > draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08 > (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08) is ready for > panel review. > > Any volunteers to look at this one? > > (We don't expect too many more review requests for a while after this and > draft-mcgrew-hash-sigs.) > > Regards, > > Kenny > > On 09/10/2017 16:14, "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Dear colleagues, >> >> >> In Prague, we listed several todo's about our Re-keying draft; thanks to >> the efforts of the persons listed in the contributors and "thanks to" >> lists now we have a new version, addressing the comments and concerns >> that have been >> discussed earlier. >> There have been several updates of the draft, major changes from the July >> version (discussed at IETF 99 CFRG meeting) are the following: >> >> >> 1) New test examples have been added: external re-keying with a parallel >> construction based on AES-256, external re-keying with a serial >> construction based on SHA-256, OMAC-ACPKM-Master mode with AES-256, >> as agreed. >> 2) CCM-ACPKM and CCM-ACPKM-Master, OFB-ACPKM-Master modes have been >> removed from the document, as agreed. >> 3) “Key Hierarchy Construction” section has been added. >> 4) The more restrictive terminology for different types of keys has been >> introduced: "initial key", "section key" (data processing key in internal >> re-keying), "master key", "section key material", "subkey", >> "frame key" (data processing key in external re-keying). >> 5) The additional hash calculation for ICB value (if c!=32) has been >> removed from GCM-ACPKM and GCM-ACPKM-Master modes. >> >> >> The current version >> (https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08) seems to take >> all concerns and considerations we've discussed (in Chicago, in Prague >> and in e-mails) into account – please let me know if we've missed >> something. If there won't be any objections, I think we should start >> thinking about moving to the review phase. >> >> >> Kindest regards, >> Stanislav >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2017-10-09 17:36 GMT+03:00 <internet-drafts@ietf.org>: >> >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts >> directories. >> This draft is a work item of the Crypto Forum RG of the IRTF. >> >> Title : Re-keying Mechanisms for Symmetric Keys >> Author : Stanislav Smyshlyaev >> Filename : draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08.txt >> Pages : 49 >> Date : 2017-10-09 >> >> Abstract: >> A certain maximum amount of data can be safely encrypted when >> encryption is performed under a single key. This amount is called >> "key lifetime". This specification describes a variety of methods to >> increase the lifetime of symmetric keys. It provides external and >> internal re-keying mechanisms based on hash functions and on block >> ciphers, that can be used with modes of operations such as CTR, GCM, >> CBC, CFB and OMAC. >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying/ >> >> There are also htmlized versions available at: >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08 >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-cfrg-re-keying-08 >> >> >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of >> submission >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at >> tools.ietf.org <http://tools.ietf.org>. >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cfrg mailing list >> Cfrg@irtf.org >> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg >> >> >> >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Crypto-panel mailing list > Crypto-panel@irtf.org > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel >
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-… Paterson, Kenny
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-… Yaron Sheffer
- Re: [Crypto-panel] [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-… Russ Housley