Re: [Crypto-panel] Status of KangarooTwelve draft

Benoît Viguier <b.viguier@cs.ru.nl> Tue, 07 July 2020 09:32 UTC

Return-Path: <b.viguier@cs.ru.nl>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 943D23A08B2; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 02:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65T60OGrYquB; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 02:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.science.ru.nl (smtp3.science.ru.nl [131.174.30.193]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D36C3A08B6; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 02:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (static.kpn.net [77.172.0.215] (may be forged)) (authen=benoit) by smtp3.science.ru.nl (8.15.2/5.32) with ESMTPSA id 0679WD1r022975; Tue, 7 Jul 2020 11:32:14 +0200
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>, draft-irtf-cfrg-kangarootwelve.authors@ietf.org
Cc: "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>, crypto-panel@irtf.org
References: <87f4eae8-c08d-671b-a279-19fe3646eecb@isode.com>
From: Benoît Viguier <b.viguier@cs.ru.nl>
Message-ID: <4573d2c9-59fd-07ed-61a3-67209f4766ca@cs.ru.nl>
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 11:32:13 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87f4eae8-c08d-671b-a279-19fe3646eecb@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/UM4V0u438kcZ-B8F2nzVID-df44>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Status of KangarooTwelve draft
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 09:32:22 -0000

Dear Alexey, Nick and Stanislav,

Thank you for the update!
 
We thought that there were not many comments in the last call might have
meant that the document was in a very good shape.
 
We agreed with you that during the discussion, the adoption and the
development of the draft, there were not a lot of activities as there
had been with many of the CFRG's standard specifications.
 
We appreciate your call for an additional round of reviews from the
crypto panel and reviews from the crypto panel's members.

Please do not hesitate to keep us to date with the process or to contact
us for any further information.
 
Kind regards,
Benoît, David, Gilles, Joan and Quynh

On 6/19/20 6:54 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> Dear editors,
>
> Based on CFRG Last Call, I can see weak support for the document. I
> would like to ask for an extra review from Crypto Panel to make sure
> that the document is solid. Once the review is done (and you address
> comments, if any), I will send it to IRSG for review and publication.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Alexey
>
-- 
Kind regards,

Benoît Viguier
Software Engineer - PhD Student | Cryptography & Formal Methods
Radboud University | Mercator 1, Toernooiveld 212
6525 EC Nijmegen, the Netherlands | www.viguier.nl