Re: [Crypto-panel] Request for review: OPAQUE

Yes!

Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com> schrieb am Mo., 21. Aug. 2023,
08:13:

> Thanks to Chloe and Jean-Philippe, we've got two reviewers for the OPAQUE
> draft.
>
> But the chairs would be happy to have three reviews, taking the importance
> of the document into account.
>
> >>The OPAQUE protocol was selected as a result of the PAKE selection
> process in CFRG; there were a lot of reviews of the protocol and the early
> versions of the draft, see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection
> >> There were several important questions in those reviews which had to be
> addressed during the evolution of the draft in CFRG: some of them are
> underlined in the following paper: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/839.pdf
>
> Bjoern, Julia, Scott, could one of you do a review as well?
>
> Regards,
> Stanislav
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 1:34 PM Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Chloe!
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Stanislav
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 1:17 PM Chloe Martindale <
>> chloemartindale@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I can also do this one.
>>>
>>> On Fri, 18 Aug 2023 at 10:09, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good, thanks!
>>>>
>>>> >> Any deadline?
>>>> It would be great to have the reviews until September 10th. Will it be
>>>> OK for you?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Stanislav
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:18 AM Jean-Philippe Aumasson <
>>>> jeanphilippe.aumasson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'll volunteer, haven't contributed in a while.
>>>>>
>>>>> Any deadline?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri 18 Aug 2023 at 07:18 Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev <smyshsv@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Crypto Panel Experts,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The chairs would like to ask the Crypto Panel to provide three (or
>>>>>> more) reviews for the OPAQUE draft, "The OPAQUE Asymmetric PAKE Protocol",
>>>>>> draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque-11 (
>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-opaque/)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The OPAQUE protocol was selected as a result of the PAKE selection
>>>>>> process in CFRG; there were a lot of reviews of the protocol and the early
>>>>>> versions of the draft, see https://github.com/cfrg/pake-selection
>>>>>> There were several important questions in those reviews which had to
>>>>>> be addressed during the evolution of the draft in CFRG: some of them are
>>>>>> underlined in the following paper:
>>>>>> https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/839.pdf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hence we would like to ask the reviewers to pay a lot of attention to
>>>>>> reviewing this draft, trying to take into account as many considerations
>>>>>> provided in the previous reviews as possible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stanislav (on behalf of the CFRG Chairs)
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>>>>>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org
>>>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>>>> Crypto-panel@irtf.org
>>>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>>>>
>>>