IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2

"Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com> Tue, 03 December 2019 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <smyshsv@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DEBF1200B1 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 04:24:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GzDbNXXeOT0r for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 04:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x12e.google.com (mail-lf1-x12e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA3D12008D for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 3 Dec 2019 04:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x12e.google.com with SMTP id m30so2759280lfp.8 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 04:24:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QuOV921UNi8+AQGypEscR9eOJpgmJyFdko5/fA4pF4M=; b=KH/LcbtolA8h+cbX4kBaZpouvsQkL2Q0bseyUqo2Brz6Bnm+MazLOSaqD0CiRFVBX8 R7yC4GHJ1FixI0rADNiRm3xjnLytzQQpiMwmb4eQ5HG1QEaKIhL6L1JrYFRMedKQNYKM V5j4TvrdYCtriUAYBviufrsKO3jdScBWY9Xp842aQy6G7mqqYKgYdWzxxx3DdD58Jgvp kXBFMKKXyPigL/8PVEzCf08qIgl8Xm4u2Z8VqeUC8jI1EobjOkKENTY7fdx7kE5NqVFn 7JyY8duaRssZ5InvVz0xzfzDfowtZZNBQdWcF6vrJuwB2LQ4W+xm6efZ80sGFwN28PDm trCQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QuOV921UNi8+AQGypEscR9eOJpgmJyFdko5/fA4pF4M=; b=OMuUkQYUhaPvB07QZpIeqRdWyf+fFPgmxJwa2GbVSJoSWK7tKo1XDtiWQiL9r9NKUV iPH62JPqNmY1Swg20SMVzSStQhXhh0dnlrRuP4+K9+4YhHaWCvP/XabP2QYKt6wUYfyJ NaXx7IlBteM/ZEqfjiy2tVYjQP8WFLIz0y4BksHpsTNCrl38WMC+K5xTcjlzQDIV/BmR QPU4Onys724NX6aer7mqCcTqQstSR8gmMdbugHiBfoIiUVe0iJRe3KJVo/Bb0sXJM2Ir kIRFnSNR9SVA+WwbkbGHyqFsBSTsIBPD2elK+51nPbzZJgYgjnYMV2SEgfkPWw2fsw5Q OBpw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWSEs9Cz/C4Q9pxlrQtsgbH8652d4JUDhUm1PMe1TUp0zRPhRkK tlQDSglXNplW4uv2RxI+XSFqJRQqWz12/Vg9Wdo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyZwkeVk0y26amzrQHSwpTnG7CwzFixAF/IkXs0dHXntawOkMuTeReLAfYNcMNbgQqj7V9YYjTAiOuwZiP8j2M=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:48bc:: with SMTP id u28mr2470737lfg.161.1575375841608; Tue, 03 Dec 2019 04:24:01 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAMr0u6mhzze8aEh1mx50Le=LEV8zE5rzS0m047aA_hMKMsbUPA@mail.gmail.com> <FC4F267F-3254-4E7C-AE15-C9408CF3CCCE@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FC4F267F-3254-4E7C-AE15-C9408CF3CCCE@gmail.com>
From: "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 15:23:52 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMr0u6nVJaE0WmACGfZ-oCQVSws=TVHevsDn3rFEtmFviXB9-Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: crypto-panel@irtf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006d4c360598cbc559"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/jQQ1pvod6OxMCkFf6MSHAFusmSw>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2019 12:24:06 -0000

Dear Yaron,

>> if you concur with my definition: “an attacker with a quantum computer
needs to solve [one or more] DLP per password guess.”
I concur with this definition - maybe it is not the only one possible, but
in any case the authors of the PAKEs will be able to express their extended
opinion on this.

Regards,
Stanislav



вт, 3 дек. 2019 г. в 03:43, Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>:

> Hi Stanislav,
>
>
>
> Can you please add a definition of “quantum annoyance”, or let me know if
> you concur with my definition: “an attacker with a quantum computer needs to
>
>    solve [one or more] DLP per password guess.”
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>                 Yaron
>
>
>
> *From: *Crypto-panel <crypto-panel-bounces@irtf.org> on behalf of
> "Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev" <smyshsv@gmail.com>
> *Date: *Monday, December 2, 2019 at 00:26
> *To: *<crypto-panel@irtf.org>
> *Subject: *[Crypto-panel] A question to be considered at Round 2
>
>
>
> I would ask to add the following question to be considered during Round 2
> of the PAKE selection process - the question which was discussed in the
> CFRG mailing list before IETF 106.
>
>
>
> To each of the remaining 4 PAKEs:
>
> - Quantum annoyance of the PAKE?
>
> - Post-quantum preparedness of the PAKE?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Stanislav
>
> _______________________________________________ Crypto-panel mailing list
> Crypto-panel@irtf.org https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email