Re: [Crypto-panel] Review of AES-GCM-SIV

Tibor Jager <> Thu, 15 June 2017 15:12 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A4012EAB7 for <>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtyH6ZGw38fJ for <>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F070212957C for <>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with SMTP id u12so24345895qth.0 for <>; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F09+X3nnG8AYev76wCIRyE31HRPXgoBXoYCbjCsPGdg=; b=qH3oyguYBxnZxj15r80+ZM6ZbWlhwDH6fVNvCadSnOv3JJ2hWFuVLQ7rRAe24PHW2x 2+C8NDUliuM2UNRi5V9LI9MKpfVGru6qKfvM9wVOhXapqL7hEtu10Q82w2Nb2+uyvggQ rRmIGbKuAZtrk+/JreFZcG2vflrZQE8mkWHBbKCGEXQhA4yu/jWTQ9jffB96lHUwi475 Bopk21XIoGv6zNfUt8+guac0spKlblHB7OUN7nr+09I3y0YxyckZxvJprveKSekwpa2Z qwvTa2bqCrG+nfXcX4fq6pHb8tp7sMh82MDzUg01GpIEqcP21VEHj8VLaP/LEMVBpNhA c8jA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F09+X3nnG8AYev76wCIRyE31HRPXgoBXoYCbjCsPGdg=; b=jDfj5dK6vv8nOSy7gBBTa0f7fagOa4GbHZ2uwGPLyAt4XppCAMr8UYpFNbpBFOHrSw a6zoMVNpOzwelzIMJ3LVqNghde8UfdLHL9TZKM4AU829bt1sauUo8PHTYx7JK01ReGV5 gkpdQh0xp0raiu/lCB+CLgQFPML/ijsokhuXtZh1acCTpScDpntOrdlcoFaSLRGuhgup awQQ8Oz/IOMU7WXhUSFir9IRTOgDVS9kfnFMz9Rnh4OxXX8Xug3uzzUcZSfAna8BZKRg mtxETNDOxo4A2xHJZFJarj5liTuNd6idQcfb3h+RraZWEqX06FG0JJsiOll9ejmEGEt0 o5pg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOwjCYhBKVcbjhHbZ1X1GK6eLmDHoWwhcdPe9zIlA0sVsIA5jquI 3pagj9hp5IR3KuIQbN9ONbjedU1aUw==
X-Received: by with SMTP id r66mr7343921qkb.14.1497539534104; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by with HTTP; Thu, 15 Jun 2017 08:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <>
From: Tibor Jager <>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 17:12:13 +0200
Message-ID: <>
To: "Paterson, Kenny" <>
Cc:, Alexey Melnikov <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114cb59af7af240552011740"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Crypto-panel] Review of AES-GCM-SIV
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 15:12:21 -0000

Hi Kenny,

I can have a look at the draft, I wanted to read the paper anyway.


Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse brevity.

Am 15.06.2017 16:38 schrieb "Paterson, Kenny" <>uk>:

Dear CFRG panel members,

Any volunteers from the panel to perform a review of:

I'd like to move it towards last call, and having a couple of reviews from
you fine people would help give us the confidence to do so.

The draft might be best read in conjunction with the technical paper:

though of course it needs to stand alone as an RFC.

Let me know.



Crypto-panel mailing list