[Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms

Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com> Wed, 07 August 2019 17:58 UTC

Return-Path: <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
X-Original-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74654120284 for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:58:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, GB_ABOUTYOU=0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=isode.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BpcjU3UbGzPI for <crypto-panel@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from waldorf.isode.com (waldorf.isode.com [62.232.206.188]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB24120691 for <crypto-panel@irtf.org>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 10:58:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1565200693; d=isode.com; s=june2016; i=@isode.com; bh=uG8/LtEhovjremb7He0uyKYmVpnF/w/Y0ES/6A+1TEk=; h=From:Sender:Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description; b=Zf3Sbu0Q5YqKtB5ffZz+/mmY8/oZ58VldBsbyZpwlwDchCyjvE97GrT3AHqIixgVTGuEsj jVvEN1e3yqWiDgjFKzwayh0Q2uI/8sSxdXu3ddSI7lLtWPk3oyRk6h63N/+ZHVKBglA3hC 3ZLAkcLyDXsiQSDqd6orYvOCi4O67io=;
Received: from [172.20.1.215] (dhcp-215.isode.net [172.20.1.215]) by waldorf.isode.com (submission channel) via TCP with ESMTPSA id <XUsRNAAImIdy@waldorf.isode.com>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 18:58:13 +0100
To: "crypto-panel@irtf.org" <crypto-panel@irtf.org>
Cc: "cfrg-chairs@ietf.org" <cfrg-chairs@ietf.org>
From: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <7c37bae3-f816-e3f0-c070-a908a4af9a07@isode.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 18:58:01 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------E8C253A5D050141A4521FE63"
Content-Language: en-GB
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/crypto-panel/t-dmz0jrFnVunXLqsVTaGjfdL-g>
Subject: [Crypto-panel] Soliciting reviews of submitted PAKE algorithms
X-BeenThere: crypto-panel@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <crypto-panel.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/crypto-panel/>
List-Post: <mailto:crypto-panel@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel>, <mailto:crypto-panel-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:58:15 -0000

Dear Crypto Review Panel members!

According to the plan, the most important parts of the PAKE selection 
process is done by the Crypto Review Panel members.
More precisely, the Crypto Review Panel members will need to do the 
following:
1) Crypto Review Panel members do the verification of security proofs of 
the candidates and overall security assessment by September 15th 2019.
2) Crypto Review Panel members review all gathered materials (including 
independent reviews). If additional explanations are needed, Crypto 
Review Panel members ask for them from the designers. Crypto Review 
Panel members write overall reviews for all candidate PAKEs, based on 
the materials that have been gathered and verified. This is to be done 
by October 30th 2019.

We have 8 nominated PAKEs: 4 balanced and 4 augmented.
Each member is asked to provide reviews for either all 4 balanced or all 
4 augmented PAKEs (or for all 8 PAKEs, if the member is happy to do that).

Please reply to this message and tell the CFRG chairs about your 
willingness to do this and, if yes, would you prefer to deal with 4 
balanced PAKEs or with 4 augmented PAKEs (or, maybe, with all 8 of them).

Best Regards,
Alexey (on behalf of CFRG chairs)