Re: [Crypto-panel] Fwd: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-12.txt

[Alexey Melnikov <[e-mail]>]

Hi Russ,

On 11/08/2020 17:43, Russ Housley wrote:
> > We recommend the following two protocols to be selected as 
> «recommended by the CFRG for usage in IETF protocols»: one balanced 
> PAKE - CPace, and one augmented PAKE - OPAQUE.
>
> What was the point of the selection process if we are going to publish 
> the ones that were not selected too?

It is needed by Kitten WG for one of Kerberos documents. The idea is to 
publish it with a disclaimer that it predated PAKE selection process and 
was not selected as one of the finalists.

Best Regards,

Alexey

>
> Russ
>
>
>
>> On Aug 11, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Stanislav V. Smyshlyaev 
>> <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Crypto Panel experts,
>>
>> Could someone please take a quick look at the updated version (taking 
>> into account the reviews made during the PAKE selection process)?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Stanislav (on behalf of CFRG chairs)
>>
>> ---------- Пересылаемое сообщение ---------
>> От: *Watson Ladd* <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>> Дата: пн, 10 авг. 2020 г. в 23:29
>> Тема: Re: [Cfrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-12.txt
>> Кому: <[e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>>
>>
>>
>> This fixes the comment on missing identities received during the PAKE
>> competition which was the only one I found.
>>
>> I think it's ready for RGLC.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 4:27 PM <[e-mail] 
>> <mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
>> directories.
>> > This draft is a work item of the Crypto Forum RG of the IRTF.
>> >
>> >         Title           : SPAKE2, a PAKE
>> >         Authors         : Watson Ladd
>> >                           Benjamin Kaduk
>> >         Filename        : draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-12.txt
>> >         Pages           : 16
>> >         Date            : 2020-08-10
>> >
>> > Abstract:
>> >    This document describes SPAKE2 which is a protocol for two parties
>> >    that share a password to derive a strong shared key with no risk of
>> >    disclosing the password.  This method is compatible with any group,
>> >    is computationally efficient, and SPAKE2 has a security proof.  This
>> >    document predated the CFRG PAKE competition and it was not selected.
>> >
>> >
>> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2/
>> >
>> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-12
>> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-12
>> >
>> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-irtf-cfrg-spake2-12
>> >
>> >
>> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
>> submission
>> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org 
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/>.
>> >
>> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Cfrg mailing list
>> > [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> > https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> "Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains".
>> --Rousseau.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cfrg mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>> _______________________________________________
>> Crypto-panel mailing list
>> [e-mail] <mailto:[e-mail]>
>> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/crypto-panel
>