Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO

"Zhu, Jing Z" <> Wed, 23 November 2011 17:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31CB711E809A for <>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:16:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ov0XSeEz6Jd3 for <>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:16:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 073F011E8099 for <>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2011 09:16:21 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.67,352,1309762800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="79257590"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 23 Nov 2011 09:16:21 -0800
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:16:18 -0700
From: "Zhu, Jing Z" <>
To: Lucy yong <>, Leeyoung <>, "" <>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:16:17 -0700
Thread-Topic: survey on research on CSO
Thread-Index: AcypdAnzi3KLuceBQMe/+dHGBykHxAAD2M0gACAJZ+A=
Message-ID: <>
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx> <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D19E852FF@dfweml506-mbx>
In-Reply-To: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D19E852FF@dfweml506-mbx>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E1A1564674E5754FB00AB9AC949D5E326119D8749Frrsmsx501amrc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is for pre-WG technical discussion of cross stratum optimization <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:16:23 -0000

Support! -Jing

From: [] On Behalf Of Leeyoung
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 6:09 PM
Subject: [cso] survey on research on CSO


Enclosed is the CSO research proposal PPT presented during the IRTF Open Meeting. As previously sent meeting notes indicated, there is no doubt that there is an interested party on CSO research and many people have contributed to further this research in the past months.

I'd like to take this opportunity to ask people on the mailing list if they do/do not support forming a CSO research group. This information will be used as a barometer to indicate the level of interest in the community.

If you do support forming a CSO research group, please say in your reply, "support"; otherwise, "not support."

Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Your response to this poll will be very crucial in determining the future CSO research effort.

Best Regards,