Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO

김태연 <> Thu, 24 November 2011 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D345221F8B39 for <>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -97.65
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-97.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEILja7WBLCy for <>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA4F21F8B38 for <>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 16:18:25 -0800 (PST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCAA3E.94872E67"
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:18:18 +0900
Message-ID: <2C5FF2C84E24624E8895322D1C64F636021CDACC@email2>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
Thread-Topic: [cso] survey on research on CSO
thread-index: AcypdAnzi3KLuceBQMe/+dHGBykHxAAyktZw
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
From: =?ks_c_5601-1987?B?sejFwr+s?= <>
To: <>
Subject: Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is for pre-WG technical discussion of cross stratum optimization <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:18:26 -0000




TaeYeon Kim

Principal Engineer, ETRI


TEL: 042-860-6377

Mobile : 010-4189-0052

From: [] On Behalf Of Leeyoung
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 9:09 AM
Subject: [cso] survey on research on CSO




Enclosed is the CSO research proposal PPT presented during the IRTF Open Meeting. As previously sent meeting notes indicated, there is no doubt that there is an interested party on CSO research and many people have contributed to further this research in the past months. 


I’d like to take this opportunity to ask people on the mailing list if they do/do not support forming a CSO research group. This information will be used as a barometer to indicate the level of interest in the community.


If you do support forming a CSO research group, please say in your reply, “support”; otherwise, “not support.” 


Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Your response to this poll will be very crucial in determining the future CSO research effort.  


Best Regards,