IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO

Giada Landi <g.landi@nextworks.it> Thu, 24 November 2011 08:31 UTC

Return-Path: <g.landi@nextworks.it>
X-Original-To: cso@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cso@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7C321F86A6 for <cso@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:31:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jBPYJAPLr3wC for <cso@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:31:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mercurio.nextworks.it (unknown [213.182.68.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 4046E21F86A1 for <cso@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 00:31:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercurio.nextworks.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B08304005; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:31:22 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nextworks.it
Received: from mercurio.nextworks.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercurio.nextworks.it [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VRnSPdEmGXd7; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:31:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mercurio.nextworks.it (mercurio.nextworks.it [10.0.1.12]) by mercurio.nextworks.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55116304004; Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:31:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 09:31:15 +0100
From: Giada Landi <g.landi@nextworks.it>
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <24688492.47011322123475944.JavaMail.root@mercurio>
In-Reply-To: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [10.0.2.172]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 5.0.18_GA_3011.UBUNTU8 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Win)/5.0.18_GA_3011.UBUNTU8)
Cc: cso@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO
X-BeenThere: cso@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is for pre-WG technical discussion of cross stratum optimization <cso.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cso>
List-Post: <mailto:cso@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 08:31:18 -0000

Support.

Giada




----- Original Message -----
From: "Leeyoung" <leeyoung@huawei.com>
To: cso@ietf.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 November, 2011 01:08:36 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: [cso] survey on research on CSO





Hi, 



Enclosed is the CSO research proposal PPT presented during the IRTF Open Meeting. As previously sent meeting notes indicated, there is no doubt that there is an interested party on CSO research and many people have contributed to further this research in the past months. 



I’d like to take this opportunity to ask people on the mailing list if they do/do not support forming a CSO research group. This information will be used as a barometer to indicate the level of interest in the community. 



If you do support forming a CSO research group, please say in your reply, “support”; otherwise, “not support.” 



Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Your response to this poll will be very crucial in determining the future CSO research effort. 



Best Regards, 

Young 
_______________________________________________
cso mailing list
cso@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cso

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email