Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO

Zhangfatai <zhangfatai@huawei.com> Wed, 23 November 2011 09:09 UTC

Return-Path: <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: cso@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cso@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991B821F8C2A for <cso@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:09:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.331, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pye5Fvn78ogd for <cso@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.66]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6164721F8C11 for <cso@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:09:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga03-in [172.24.2.9]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LV300NLBVYI0H@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for cso@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:06:18 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LV3001TKVY660@szxga03-in.huawei.com> for cso@ietf.org; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:06:18 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml208-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AFE90232; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:06:18 +0800
Received: from SZXEML422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.161) by szxeml208-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:06:14 +0800
Received: from SZXEML520-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.92]) by szxeml422-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.161]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:06:11 +0800
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:06:11 +0000
From: Zhangfatai <zhangfatai@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
X-Originating-IP: [10.70.76.157]
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "cso@ietf.org" <cso@ietf.org>
Message-id: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF825CAFA85@SZXEML520-MBX.china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_qU22RFBrPD/Mu1nb1Df6dA)"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Thread-topic: survey on research on CSO
Thread-index: AcypdAnzi3KLuceBQMe/+dHGBykHxAASxJig
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
Subject: Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO
X-BeenThere: cso@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is for pre-WG technical discussion of cross stratum optimization <cso.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cso>
List-Post: <mailto:cso@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:09:18 -0000

Support.





Thanks

Fatai

From: cso-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cso-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leeyoung
Sent: 2011年11月23日 8:09
To: cso@ietf.org
Subject: [cso] survey on research on CSO

Hi,

Enclosed is the CSO research proposal PPT presented during the IRTF Open Meeting. As previously sent meeting notes indicated, there is no doubt that there is an interested party on CSO research and many people have contributed to further this research in the past months.

I’d like to take this opportunity to ask people on the mailing list if they do/do not support forming a CSO research group. This information will be used as a barometer to indicate the level of interest in the community.

If you do support forming a CSO research group, please say in your reply, “support”; otherwise, “not support.”

Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Your response to this poll will be very crucial in determining the future CSO research effort.

Best Regards,
Young