Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO

Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> Wed, 23 November 2011 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: cso@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cso@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B53911E80E0 for <cso@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:59:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.073
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.073 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.525, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLxkIG1WrVgs for <cso@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usaga04-in.huawei.com (usaga04-in.huawei.com [206.16.17.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5275C11E80DD for <cso@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (usaga04-in [172.18.4.101]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LV300I0BC6OKK@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for cso@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:59:12 -0600 (CST)
Received: from dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.18.4.104]) by usaga04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LV300EWVC6NLP@usaga04-in.huawei.com> for cso@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 19:59:11 -0600 (CST)
Received: from DFWEML404-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.193.5.203) by dfweml202-edg.china.huawei.com (172.18.9.108) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.270.1; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:59:12 -0800
Received: from DFWEML506-MBX.china.huawei.com ([10.124.31.111]) by dfweml404-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.193.5.203]) with mapi id 14.01.0270.001; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:58:02 -0800
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:59:01 +0000
From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
X-Originating-IP: [10.47.129.140]
To: Leeyoung <leeyoung@huawei.com>, "cso@ietf.org" <cso@ietf.org>
Message-id: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D19E852FF@dfweml506-mbx>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_6mc6f3dn9Z9xX9iUZif69A)"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: survey on research on CSO
Thread-index: AcypdAnzi3KLuceBQMe/+dHGBykHxAAD2M0g
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
References: <7AEB3D6833318045B4AE71C2C87E8E171819601E@dfweml501-mbx>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:29:50 -0800
Subject: Re: [cso] survey on research on CSO
X-BeenThere: cso@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: This list is for pre-WG technical discussion of cross stratum optimization <cso.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cso>
List-Post: <mailto:cso@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cso>, <mailto:cso-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 01:59:15 -0000

support!

Lucy

From: cso-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cso-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leeyoung
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2011 6:09 PM
To: cso@ietf.org
Subject: [cso] survey on research on CSO

Hi,

Enclosed is the CSO research proposal PPT presented during the IRTF Open Meeting. As previously sent meeting notes indicated, there is no doubt that there is an interested party on CSO research and many people have contributed to further this research in the past months.

I'd like to take this opportunity to ask people on the mailing list if they do/do not support forming a CSO research group. This information will be used as a barometer to indicate the level of interest in the community.

If you do support forming a CSO research group, please say in your reply, "support"; otherwise, "not support."

Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Your response to this poll will be very crucial in determining the future CSO research effort.

Best Regards,
Young