Re: [Curdle] Which curves are MUST and SHOULD ?

Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <hkario@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CFD3A0C46 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 05:04:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.369
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.369 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W6ngNp6jqmfu for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 05:04:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [216.205.24.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F87C3A0C30 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 05:04:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1609851844; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=bP7WWEfo4dK1XunMZLezrxTpMe+nsy7VId4N+iFIPwI=; b=EiSgbOguSdWlR+yuj55ZbR9WYlju3hBapoLERMvNo/TP9zvONrSyhl/eKKGu28eBiB67gT FIxPrJpf+vLfn3/7NPV7+Qm2/4dl401t4E07pVwcVeiIeAQN6cp8yHNVw4C9QTFhzWSW+M gE1pge6abmkJCm8OaSlsn4334QDuIOo=
Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-221--KpPL7YNNaKgm9DqOmEViA-1; Tue, 05 Jan 2021 08:04:00 -0500
X-MC-Unique: -KpPL7YNNaKgm9DqOmEViA-1
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A54C3195D560; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:03:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (unknown [10.40.208.67]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B97BC5D6CF; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:03:58 +0000 (UTC)
From: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
To: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:03:56 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <a7b3a180-8dfc-4fd2-9b5a-5df519e0b61a@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADPMZDAb6Tcbiqi2UDrWOKzj5SQiSU-FOkqOjEELxiru--m8yw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <2CCABC30-F757-4659-9FF3-5AADDD51EE30@akamai.com> <4b681efd49274f03c7e0521e127e031426632ad0.camel@redhat.com> <CADZyTkk--kCWqE7q0Xi5C40V92MuZBktDzQGt_vPSZPiBy7v9w@mail.gmail.com> <18479.1606885358@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <20201205194724.GB64351@kduck.mit.edu> <37691.1607621661@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <1607647129866.76532@cs.auckland.ac.nz> <2917.1607672034@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <012AE120-2516-44F6-B729-ED342A137535@timeheart.net> <ED8F3B46-A5CC-4D14-A714-FD1C0AA67486@akamai.com> <12959BD6-F3AB-418B-8CE0-C3BE43999435@timeheart.net> <40887.1608233724@eng-mail03> <0f4dce32-b362-43d8-85e0-9608ca3427ab@redhat.com> <90135.1609791710@eng-mail03> <CADPMZDAb6Tcbiqi2UDrWOKzj5SQiSU-FOkqOjEELxiru--m8yw@mail.gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat
User-Agent: Trojita/0.7-git; Qt/5.14.2; xcb; Linux; Fedora release 32 (Thirty Two)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15
Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=hkario@redhat.com
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/-wdDjzmouT4loUbuTGBUQq4fpFA>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] =?iso-8859-1?q?Which_curves_are_MUST_and_SHOULD_=3F?=
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:04:07 -0000

On Tuesday, 5 January 2021 13:54:58 CET, denis bider wrote:
> It's not both. It is developers that are aware of RFCs.
>
> In my experience supporting users over 20 years, only a vanishing minority
> of users are even aware of RFCs, and none read them.

by "user" I mean "administrator"

and system administrators do read RFC

> denis
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 2:21 PM Mark D. Baushke <mdb=
> 40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> writes:
>>  ...
>
>

-- 
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00  Brno, Czech Republic