[Curdle] State of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2?

denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com> Sat, 11 July 2020 17:15 UTC

Return-Path: <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F3D33A110F; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:15:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bN1w94sPYe9T; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:15:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023533A110E; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id a21so6481951otq.8; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y3oZ8Hnr9IuPQIXo3N/MAOznC4eWpLbl7opFXuLhD7c=; b=c/rtH/yHSPXOiXw0UV1zKPZtoiKTBcTJypUKK7+k6n6Wzl+9wVQQQesW84daJI9HwP S3Zr2j8uNyBZ+5TAjlll0nPpAvg1f1rVBs/IteUpKssD8PJoMJOgQMa6WCBdARAplRBc 5P6f1DF6V1UqflMEC5X3+NC5WRqsbHZ+NvME3ud0a/J9RD75WGrr0i/Phj0L1ksD7tfg Fcp1riFcIR/UC8AM+UuxWjiG5c/2RVSiHO3XV9Egq6OslTHUZqRfQbOLNBIlE+3Vqn2b /BjtrK1SnPq7Z2dwtxOP6ocvTnkNozcZfAU7A24t2DmvvlIV30dRiPHMDinRE89BypZt v44g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=y3oZ8Hnr9IuPQIXo3N/MAOznC4eWpLbl7opFXuLhD7c=; b=RcEwL0ifKd9K3oiaRvKNBB+RBxU8WvVFQHRwJnytAB79q5BB7lhVJLr8EgbKDofWFS Hb6+ZkOyZFhmVETf20RH2Rpoox674es4+MVdVmZLrmsh6yNiuSXntj2h/QCnRZCZNxrA z7YyZjbG5jtYy+JB70o6yDqZv6+WgfzT8a1ukgQLA0PDYtwnDoVskHewlvYe7ZoyX6BK JijvlVcRERv7J64h+YjBB1aZe98UGedMmn6Teg2D7FLIgOKDII/ZC9K8EuI2GGC3spGF 1tubWKb2nNZ1m3+BO3Up8IGX+JxdfeLpmfojWMs8R3z1fafkMNBcBSmyRyfcDo5tNr+K gVaQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533tfUG9xEEIXTgblx5qEEoKeWzjqWcP9LFrVmHnZLQZJkJVDzXe XeiZag+xla87eYy8huMJ3kN3UpUQo6VPR2o8ejVc1M8TCVg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyT4ABRVzSbfQX3U8YMf7ZkrNgeUyVZ6eJcEQcUS9DtTRgVvNFF/HL5S4GfmOvL2ZwSopztc2vxfAWb+b/SURE=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1617:: with SMTP id g23mr36997596otr.282.1594487721088; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 10:15:21 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 12:15:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CADPMZDB8oXAg0g0oJvZmkK1XPhb28SQPnxwRmL9umzFXkH0ogQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: curdle <curdle@ietf.org>, curdle-chairs <curdle-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000036d8b105aa2d9a1e"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/8_O2eBKl3t3DNPshaMZsKHlpAj8>
Subject: [Curdle] State of draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2?
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 17:15:23 -0000

Hey everyone,

I notice the following draft has not moved forward:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-kex-sha2/

This seems to be an important draft which would standardize the current use
of key exchange algorithms in SSH. However, it looks like no changes have
been made in 2.5 years?

Did I miss some event where this draft morphed into something else so that
I'm not seeing the right information about progress?

Otherwise, what seems to be the current obstacle with making progress on
this?

denis