[Curdle] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves-11: (with COMMENT)

[Adam Roach via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-curves/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for the work on documenting this key exchange method.

I'm a little surprised that there is no discussion of deployment considerations
for deploying "curve25519-sha256" into an environment in which
"[e-mail]" is already well-established (as described in the
introduction), or of sunsetting the vendor-specific version. Some advice on
which algorithms to offer and which ones to accept would probably be
worthwhile, especially if there is any long-term hope of retiring the
"[e-mail]" designator in favor of the standard one.