Re: [Curdle] AD Review of draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-05

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Tue, 29 May 2018 20:42 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C908A12EAEC for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 13:42:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.402
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.402 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.248, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FA7LUOkc1jam for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 May 2018 13:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x244.google.com (mail-lf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 659FD12E8CD for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 13:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id h9-v6so819202lfc.13 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 May 2018 13:42:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=b1gA4E+Zx7rK/4ZCNJ3Ve3mWX6BOKqNP4ksc6gWEsUQ=; b=NPYcdiqm6vHLU/2Hoa+7WY0qvpnTUXuw1oOe1kcR6mI4YGizABWutyZQCw0wNOMbV7 1VmNwWLPO3oFxgYk9iqkt6ikf9W8yqzpe5v8f13XZs/zngRcM4KWHcI5SUq4NFqn7MVq FbS3RXGu7M1h/mFk1sZz/ZyfAOjNB7RwpIg09tzkFUTRj850vn+tOR4x/dA0iFUTA3bI 0hmYzkMVVj5h0/A0vnNcq5AYlrjEQ4oHcuNT2ZaNUw3laMzGMGLSqXI2TF/p55bnRGmU XsTwK7O9Rs586liBti+hojYLbfGM7xOR9YGSBaERXvLZ9ZeZfOCt6IyDMvedFYLxqoUY b7mw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=b1gA4E+Zx7rK/4ZCNJ3Ve3mWX6BOKqNP4ksc6gWEsUQ=; b=BOP5O9lwQmoVzsO1i21ejRJN7LjrIrzWh54tj+lS8M8zezs9AXizTRjwx5EiVnOjDs Yi8AOPrPop2QtNfDXkbCH5EVi9ouGDigZZfRJRNOeQAR9PedSZdPU7u9f+onuywueH3f vqPWK298HJVHdn7+/7vp/HtJke4dzOnek4cICckQ42KPD2tfdHejD8MwQhluXxng1Jkc q6wGwx4J2gSfaD1KJ9sSK6AuVHx2whTgaSlfneXJ+3abmVi59qR+zcZU36DBAJP0O+x4 XddiaYVdS1N5+Uo66vNbA+u0UBI+bSQLLIHZqvVBke6/9eMY10f6ZATtgpSoBRbSEdaK n6sw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwf0LoCtHmBPj8SWslUJ0OoB/31N74GvShJp3Yl6crZ94pjQUmC9 qPCaqV5hcOiEqJAYrLu7xKvq+wF9HsEkvOODvBo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJxZ7S+IaCrdxasyn7bDzwXyMQKRfte8t/BSAdlGIW2KRmUav+gR4xkUYfDYyduf7E234BYabCqx7CCFLOq/CY=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9d07:: with SMTP id t7-v6mr12040794lji.7.1527626557455; Tue, 29 May 2018 13:42:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mglt.ietf@gmail.com
Received: by 2002:a2e:510a:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Tue, 29 May 2018 13:42:36 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <45656.1527626244@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
References: <CABcZeBNCUSpGihHz6bPBSALS4-34Tm7W36BCZ_Ev8OQz3KtVag@mail.gmail.com> <1555475.KUsr8aTfev@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <CABcZeBP5LRFuH37166YMiXKce-GgJhnji_msYMrac=eQ531AMQ@mail.gmail.com> <3446969.zDdGGYQIsg@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com> <CABcZeBPeNGVy51uz78dk2REYKG8yugFvB3XdZ5PBLLFnrALTRA@mail.gmail.com> <1525201687.32101.39.camel@redhat.com> <CABcZeBOnQDS=+Uz+Ue-6ytP+bu13+PfKhAmCHqna6C858jrymg@mail.gmail.com> <1526923646.10011.43.camel@redhat.com> <CABcZeBO9fhkjcfqomnmyY8YJw93u9t7B=QC05aDGBwGgAOpd_w@mail.gmail.com> <45656.1527626244@eng-mail01.juniper.net>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 16:42:36 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: tH_QP8hpU7BpdUSAXLq3l6d_EV8
Message-ID: <CADZyTkmc5yfOFk-Jj3VcNYdAu3mhkNRCvz2q3wu3LdxxQ6A63w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb@juniper.net>
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>, Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com>, Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004e8226056d5e46ef"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/BEyEOSV_6vdivU48woX5bc5Fn3Q>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] AD Review of draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-05
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 May 2018 20:42:42 -0000

Hi,

The structure has not been raised nor discussed in the WG.

Yours,
Daniel

On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:37 PM, Mark D. Baushke <mdb@juniper.net> wrote:

> Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> writes:
>
> > Is there strong WG consensus to retain the current structure, or is
> > this just what happens to be there.
>
> I do not believe that the question was raised in the Curdle Working Group.
>
> If you think there should be a different structure, could you provide an
> outline of what you would find most useful?
>
> For this draft, I am just another member of the WG.
>
>         -- Mark
>
> _______________________________________________
> Curdle mailing list
> Curdle@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle
>