Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 03 February 2021 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60003A110F for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:11:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.25, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTnVURddJM1f for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:11:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E093A110D for <curdle@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 12:11:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0122331.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 113K6P3n007820; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:11:19 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=dK4NVhoDl2VN3my0uRM8YXU12mfgpi1gTbkDEo4fmgQ=; b=CKB5AUYSZh6RdsEeq7J0mnxADhpUMTMQ/Q3Oy9BT9N3l/05KTyXIR8EKOZVPW/tR1A5l xjKCuH4BhdgdhYprtPfll5VEVrzmuc0pz4NDMOdbcdZllTG8Y0xJ22JhrosMvAzLtS2s rxfFYpAFuruSqMNm2Wjl6xFrUHvMQN78thj21KVyexgqITihyDUzw1yueOzkoTIU26PT +tJ88ACvdV5PZjEN9NeW0AEfB0NBRFNnDRkErudbmxUyHHQNs3DReoODbds9ylodxxzy kftdWQZZMsklWf/Y66D4dafJHdjLrWp7wPglBSRl+VPu+gUoLK36YUvOKzxvGiMkHINj Dg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint7 (a72-247-45-33.deploy.static.akamaitechnologies.com [72.247.45.33] (may be forged)) by mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36d6k1ga6b-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:11:19 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com (8.16.0.43/8.16.0.43) with SMTP id 113K68IM017234; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 15:11:18 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.116]) by prod-mail-ppoint7.akamai.com with ESMTP id 36d3p3qvw5-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 03 Feb 2021 15:11:18 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.119) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:11:17 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.119]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:11:17 -0600
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: Ron Frederick <ronf@timeheart.net>
CC: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>, Curdle List <curdle@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
Thread-Index: AQHW+mX9zbjxzhrsC0qi3Tw23QtFkapG6M6AgABVo4D//676AA==
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:11:17 +0000
Message-ID: <EDAB8D80-EA88-40CF-A015-8DF66A6A8DF2@akamai.com>
References: <A77E7858-C4ED-4DA0-8015-5E67EB921144@sn3rd.com> <02E82091-15F9-4C36-96AD-1F88CC2E5594@akamai.com> <367596AB-B583-4105-9099-9055A5E5526F@timeheart.net>
In-Reply-To: <367596AB-B583-4105-9099-9055A5E5526F@timeheart.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.45.21011103
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.27.164.43]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5A032AE8E3CAE147981E23D2F1A75230@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-03_07:2021-02-03, 2021-02-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=626 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102030118
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.369, 18.0.737 definitions=2021-02-03_08:2021-02-03, 2021-02-03 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxlogscore=543 bulkscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2102030118
X-Agari-Authentication-Results: mx.akamai.com; spf=${SPFResult} (sender IP is 72.247.45.33) smtp.mailfrom=rsalz@akamai.com smtp.helo=prod-mail-ppoint7
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/MAB8FPy_qoO1xkDwZMMTX6CkWts>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Time to Review IANA SSH Registries Policies?
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2021 20:11:22 -0000

>    I’m not currently familiar with the “expert review” process that’s in place for these other registries right now, but (also speaking as an individual) I’d be interested in learning more and would potentially be interested in participating in such a review depending on the time commitment involved.

See https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8126.html#page-20 for details.

The IESG appoints the experts, almost always based on the Area Director's recommendations.