Re: [Curdle] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-09: (with COMMENT)

[Benjamin Kaduk <[e-mail]>]

On Wed, Jun 26, 2019 at 06:57:39AM -0700, Warren Kumari via Datatracker wrote:
> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-09: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thank you for for writing this - it was clear enough that I could understand
> the bits that I needed to :-)
> 
> I have a few comments:
> "Additionally we utilize also the curves defined in
> [I-D.ietf-curdle-ssh-curves] to complement the 3 classic NIST defined curves
> required by [RFC5656]." I checked on the status of I-D.ietf-curdle-ssh-curves -
> this seems to have stalled. I realize it isn't your problem, but is there a
> plan to progress I-D.ietf-curdle-ssh-curves ?

It shows up on my dashboard now, but I haven't done the research yet to see
what needs to be done.  There are plenty of "publication requested"
documents to tend to, first...

-Ben