Re: [Curdle] On SSH-XMSS

denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 01 April 2020 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE7663A1086 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:43:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JL4yIMtclgIN for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:43:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0DD83A106C for <curdle@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 07:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id x11so26163620otp.6 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=omOzgof5sM1PwX3OdG6MWMHfV0jHlDMUKyXI5SrBvqM=; b=AUGcNXnjcHjsxm0XaF9XUW+kJwA46j9CjdA5ZUlgW448jVJZlAAcQAGVhGM4C9pbir uc9zoCkEGcfO5UZhEPyQM2fKrfMt/T0Ia3zocyy0gIicv+YdGf9peYfXnIafYbR4dhBC CNUvOA7PQtqEhiEok3B+B2xASmjJOsOi7XjVgetJk+eiy9WIWRzMLw8Mevr9VT+XlXWq W3KNwM9rK9gemaqhOXAhLW95OfHPpFUpGiPsiAPZdBp1aWlyjy1flimbhJHiI/67wzTH QWLyvDbWk1OuA+A49qskFghct3Zz8nyh67BZKecTNJCeZmXBQZxwoIZCGpClQJ0eCyBy T+0A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=omOzgof5sM1PwX3OdG6MWMHfV0jHlDMUKyXI5SrBvqM=; b=iorc5edMkKLsZ1uvIWWAbXkGIEp4PMpHcdnUEwi7BrBJxWE1KL/+MuYu43nLOmsBMn 9QAKDy3KIERbHqR+6tSXxfg3e0UkebJCErWStSMe0YSkhaXpVqKdzVEJ0Cbftg6EhCLE Mz+Wz7JYX0uH2Gi3myBN2mhtv3u6rtIWjOj4uZ1CNel029F1JyCe0OyIvj/xSZsFHWm4 ZlDgzmVRevD8u8tnTc5rzT9AoWemo7SCZQsDdRfZ6Mf7ziJvUa4DorUUK2F+2W9Hs4fq J28wr3TwgaLC95fmZh/5ekb0JcwDHeH6PJ1pLe38y1rvQgElGSLfN2AkOm6MKerm0sKh 3R/Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ1cnfYVc7wgg3zj4eHytLBEKsxzng44NYUrNYMc1sORltLo1zLk +Uc3l2bbxhBHXIEsO+1DFNlucRIh87PcgJZRSSwI7JBt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vu7lXTc1vZCOwX+xen90r86iuO5uf3hfEoyDcFBZvzzo1DIO+uB7C8Op/0Y9vj4HFLrzb/H6GzKVQy1uQlESvY=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:6744:: with SMTP id w4mr17152244otm.220.1585752227713; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 07:43:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <62670578-138e-c87f-5f2f-32b50c1c506d@inf.fu-berlin.de> <25993367-F1BF-4E8C-99B1-F1E8171A82D8@akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <25993367-F1BF-4E8C-99B1-F1E8171A82D8@akamai.com>
From: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:43:33 -0500
Message-ID: <CADPMZDDiWUMuLu1iNZnPo-SFKmTu1coWMHmh8yhUy+0EgVptyA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: Marian Sigler <sigler@inf.fu-berlin.de>, "curdle@ietf.org" <curdle@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003c14ff05a23bb6bc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/PYzQ7Rj2gilJrqwdDpeZhHEA1YA>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] On SSH-XMSS
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2020 14:43:53 -0000

> > I was wondering if it was possible to add a note to the draft that it
has been rejected?
> This is generally not done.  The email archive is the record of
discussion.

Let this be my contribution to the email record, then, suggesting that
updating the draft as Marian suggests is what SHOULD be done.

Discoverability is important and policies such as the one you outline
reduce it, I estimate, by two orders of magnitude.

(For similar reasons, the text of already published RFCs should be updated
with errata, rather than attaching them separately. That current practice
reduces discoverability, I estimate, by one order of magnitude.)

denis


On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 8:38 AM Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
wrote:

> >    I was wondering if it was possible to add a note to the draft that it
>     has been rejected?
>
>
> This is generally not done.  The email archive is the record of discussion.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Curdle mailing list
> Curdle@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle
>