Re: [Curdle] AD Review of draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-05

Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com> Wed, 30 May 2018 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <hkario@redhat.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF4912EC11 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0zE-hlsiWw10 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4975612EBC2 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2018 03:25:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F998401EF11; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pintsize.usersys.redhat.com (unknown [10.43.21.250]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E11E2026DEF; Wed, 30 May 2018 10:25:25 +0000 (UTC)
From: Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com>, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 12:25:19 +0200
Message-ID: <34725207.E0R9U7BB6Z@pintsize.usersys.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO9fhkjcfqomnmyY8YJw93u9t7B=QC05aDGBwGgAOpd_w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBNCUSpGihHz6bPBSALS4-34Tm7W36BCZ_Ev8OQz3KtVag@mail.gmail.com> <1526923646.10011.43.camel@redhat.com> <CABcZeBO9fhkjcfqomnmyY8YJw93u9t7B=QC05aDGBwGgAOpd_w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2330529.W6MQr13DQD"; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.78 on 10.11.54.4
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Wed, 30 May 2018 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: inspected by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.11.55.5]); Wed, 30 May 2018 10:25:26 +0000 (UTC) for IP:'10.11.54.4' DOMAIN:'int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com' HELO:'smtp.corp.redhat.com' FROM:'hkario@redhat.com' RCPT:''
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/R6xvcYHGH2pzoEwwZwo_Sm4z03M>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] AD Review of draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-05
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2018 10:25:29 -0000

On Tuesday, 29 May 2018 21:27:34 CEST Eric Rescorla wrote:
> On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 10:27 AM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2018-05-18 at 14:12 -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > These changes look fine, though they only address some of my comments.
> > 
> > Just for clarity, is the change to describe the whole DH exchange in
> > one place what you see missing ? Is that a deal breaker ?
> > Anything else ?
> 
> That and the repeated text that is the same for each group.

the fix for repeated text about groups is already merged to master, for ECDHE: 
https://github.com/simo5/ietf/blob/eb03480d5c49e7340302e4974435f382ba26a911/
draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2.xml#L537-L553
and for FFDHE:
https://github.com/simo5/ietf/blob/eb03480d5c49e7340302e4974435f382ba26a911/
draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2.xml#L148-L164

> I'm not sure it's a dealbreaker, but it's a real point of concern for me.
> Is there
> strong WG consensus to retain the current structure, or is this just what
> happens
> to be there.
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> > Simo.
> > 
> > > On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2018-04-25 at 12:55 -0700, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Hubert Kario <hkario@redhat.com>
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I think you're misunderstanding me. My point is that there are
> > 
> > already
> > 
> > > > > > > documents
> > > > > > > which describe how to generate the private and public keys for
> > 
> > EC.
> > 
> > > > You
> > > > 
> > > > > > > should
> > > > > > > be referring to them, not recapitulating their contents here.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > proposed in https://github.com/simo5/ietf/pull/24
> > > > > 
> > > > > I will review this.
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Eric,
> > > > did you have time to look at this ?
> > > > Or do you prefer to get a new draft with these changes ?
> > > > 
> > > > Simo.


-- 
Regards,
Hubert Kario
Senior Quality Engineer, QE BaseOS Security team
Web: www.cz.redhat.com
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00  Brno, Czech Republic