[Curdle] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8410 (7070)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 02 August 2022 22:50 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfcpa.amsl.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7694C14F692 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.959
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.959 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vfq4ieFj8Jjr for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:50:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfcpa.amsl.com (rfc-editor.org [50.223.129.200]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AF3BC14F693 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfcpa.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 499) id 43C091BE76D0; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
To: simon@josefsson.org, ietf@augustcellars.com, rdd@cert.org, paul.wouters@aiven.io, daniel.migault@ericsson.com, rsalz@akamai.com
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: alex.gaynor@gmail.com, curdle@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20220802225016.43C091BE76D0@rfcpa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 15:50:16 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/Rxf1AuaDavbrPs0Dtr93nP3W754>
Subject: [Curdle] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8410 (7070)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 22:50:20 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8410,
"Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 for Use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7070

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>

Section: 10.2

Original Text
-------------
   -----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----
   MIIBLDCB36ADAgECAghWAUdKKo3DMDAFBgMrZXAwGTEXMBUGA1UEAwwOSUVURiBUZX
   N0IERlbW8wHhcNMTYwODAxMTIxOTI0WhcNNDAxMjMxMjM1OTU5WjAZMRcwFQYDVQQD
   DA5JRVRGIFRlc3QgRGVtbzAqMAUGAytlbgMhAIUg8AmJMKdUdIt93LQ+91oNvzoNJj
   ga9OukqY6qm05qo0UwQzAPBgNVHRMBAf8EBTADAQEAMA4GA1UdDwEBAAQEAwIDCDAg
   BgNVHQ4BAQAEFgQUmx9e7e0EM4Xk97xiPFl1uQvIuzswBQYDK2VwA0EAryMB/t3J5v
   /BzKc9dNZIpDmAgs3babFOTQbs+BolzlDUwsPrdGxO3YNGhW7Ibz3OGhhlxXrCe1Cg
   w1AH9efZBw==
   -----END CERTIFICATE-----


Corrected Text
--------------
A corrected encoding of the certificate.

Notes
-----
In addition to the mis-encoding described in 6936, there are additional misencodings. The critical field of X.509 extensions have `DEFAULT FALSE` (per RFC 5280). Default field values shall not be encoded in a DER sequence, but in the certificate encoding presented there these critical fields are encoded.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8410 (draft-ietf-curdle-pkix-10)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Algorithm Identifiers for Ed25519, Ed448, X25519, and X448 for Use in the Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Publication Date    : August 2018
Author(s)           : S. Josefsson, J. Schaad
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : CURves, Deprecating and a Little more Encryption
Area                : Security
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG