Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-09: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 24 June 2019 21:54 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4774112017F; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dRvWTWU0FeCR; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f67.google.com (mail-io1-f67.google.com [209.85.166.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E893B12004D; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f67.google.com with SMTP id e5so485168iok.4; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DEiH9YeClm2TiR8MFeeVRQiePyLbsqflaaS6xGtzyg0=; b=q7teoGbCnMkGpdHNmwNOAr3e5TUgB+r7GCkQSeOSBnSTOg3tSsVnllFPS9+OmCowLZ y7S0HuGWYttmRsXGvXroNmAGFj+p3bGWu6Z4Z5RlZ022KQ5gX35X9HnucRUdrIkcE6fy It6N3ZiRTOKd6x7cGXAo13J1hMv/ACBebFfFOoJO/3pC3Trl6rKSgaY4x8CoKiri1U9F 7OHd/RV6xJfv7e3rX5aNyg20nlF0PPPu/OXt8prnB0maC/SZCBN80hCpTQqLtEomyiPh wphCMwIqmGYtBKNUXMMBoJGWv2fKnEMOhBHs0bzf6852waL5qHfTsUdPqi7eOIFvjXHf MoQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUuYc8vhlhyWpHkeFXXWrC4qlL+gtlBZnJlPjWsiCG0iCwnwWee 6ttmIqe5bfXuv9lL9MpEL7iPTKMakfNCUA0Z50g=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqylSITu5w5SVMgtm/b+obEBjvY+YETeLM3bN1L+LZhqjFqt+/2+NU8S3kIqj5F23wUfe39kG8voE5sYyeRpBHU=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2248:: with SMTP id o8mr11749524ioo.90.1561413291894; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156136308744.17526.2499755801288512746.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20190624173220.GC48838@kduck.mit.edu> <CALaySJJMMS2TVhtSfp0=WUBJGN+EhYC37Dq6728rtHxuXLu1rg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALaySJJMMS2TVhtSfp0=WUBJGN+EhYC37Dq6728rtHxuXLu1rg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:54:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CALaySJKmwBtUthMUw7_eXVMFiB3EVBXqWpfgqCsbHh5HLJk9iA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, curdle-chairs@ietf.org, curdle@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/YOi0EXmgpyzp1UI950r4lt08iiE>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:54:55 -0000
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:53 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote: > > > > Each key exchange method is implicitly registered by this document. > > > > > > The registration is not implicit; it's explicit in Section 7. I suggest > > > removing "implicitly". > > > > It's implicit in that the registration is not producing a list of (md5 hash > > of OID) that are appended to the prefix and registered individually -- the > > prefix is being registered but not all the possible values that would go on > > the wire. > > Then I'd prefer, "Each key exchange prefix is registered...," but it's > not a DISCUSS, so use good judgment. I meant to say, "Each key exchange method prefix is registered...."
- [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf… Barry Leiba via Datatracker
- Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Barry Leiba
- Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-… Barry Leiba