IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Curdle] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Thu, 25 January 2018 00:01 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBD612AF6E; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:01:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.89
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G4u9BWJgZZpY; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5147F12D834; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 16:01:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Svantevit.local (99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id w0P00MoH043215 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:00:23 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host 99-152-146-228.lightspeed.dllstx.sbcglobal.net [99.152.146.228] claimed to be Svantevit.local
To: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>, 'The IESG' <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: daniel.migault@ericsson.com, curdle-chairs@ietf.org, curdle@ietf.org, draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry@ietf.org
References: <151683733787.15895.15630757079242805311.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <009c01d3956e$95866370$c0932a50$@augustcellars.com>
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <0c489bdd-893c-04c8-2875-8aff11ab3581@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:00:17 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <009c01d3956e$95866370$c0932a50$@augustcellars.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/YaAxz_wo1Cy6FRmmkc0xkKVuohM>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 00:01:03 -0000

On 1/24/18 5:53 PM, Jim Schaad wrote:
> Would adding the following lines be an adequate replacement?
>
> 0 - 99  | Retained by Symantec | [This RFC]
> 128+   | Retained by Symantec | [This RFC]

Yep, that's good also.


> I think this is more in line with normality that having a list of "this value open for registration".


To be clear, I find your solution above to be fine without any 
additional changes; however, I would like to note that assignable ranges 
are handled both with and without explicit table entries; see the 
following for contrasting approaches:

https://www.iana.org/assignments/http-status-codes/http-status-codes.xhtml
https://www.iana.org/assignments/sip-parameters/sip-parameters.xhtml#sip-parameters-7

/a

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email