[Curdle] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02: (with COMMENT)

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry-02: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schaad-curdle-oid-registry/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think it would be useful to include explicit entries in the initial IANA
table indicating those values which are currently unassigned (i.e., add a range
for 101-109 and 116-127.) For this use in particular, where overstepping the
bounds of the allocation would impinge on codes retained by Symantec, this
seems even more important than typical.