Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-09: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 24 June 2019 21:54 UTC

Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B33621201D6; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.401
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.401 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RIsLn0yChaH0; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com (mail-io1-f68.google.com [209.85.166.68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 638AD12017F; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id k8so2446280iot.1; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=v6TnoNUf4xghDRmIQN87Xwqbtp0VzfWhZxpKAbk+fc4=; b=dB7GsKn8KTyVkbAAgYbtYvwNbwkSBQZlVtKToXr3FrT9SmI5+maafV0QQDZP8CFNC3 wI6OA2SHFKDhMMHfshc9lj056oR9XdlS2hR0fh22sBmzmdDhEg5ATYIM1Z9j4z5yODid AjfuWjCwIrCXhrZ/bBuaKSBmHS4ioKAGw1Tk/7nPiRRTZIlW81uFRZj3N6h2f84JTlzr qNPWMNCrM6v8rKIqoqyKQjXVIS4cI2oSYiN+NgpSSDv8ymAhbhnxVr20lE/g7UQSocvK SYLDUK76xHzByf+vXX7GM/3iqEkM+9wnFSD+5GohwNA2wUE1BFf9zhM9UvP97WludlmN GCHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUaaCrPksidyxjcOcW35GaNa6zDtf5peaaoBDCw7UayoZol2Q5B hW66xN56ZRy5iZ175oDMIAcmG5ho6oSWS8fmCHA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx2NxI0cQw33AnbukmCkd8WUoXmDN+gMuQ/S0k1mH1lpr/ng63s6B7QuTQib8NHkwZC1ILNMRZJonF63plh5Nk=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:88c6:: with SMTP id i6mr3066948iol.107.1561413249259; Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:54:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156136308744.17526.2499755801288512746.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20190624173220.GC48838@kduck.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20190624173220.GC48838@kduck.mit.edu>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 22:53:58 +0100
Message-ID: <CALaySJJMMS2TVhtSfp0=WUBJGN+EhYC37Dq6728rtHxuXLu1rg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: "Roman D. Danyliw" <rdd@cert.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, curdle-chairs@ietf.org, curdle@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/bnwyssZSr_KpvL3n1sXeFv7doTE>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-gss-keyex-sha2-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 21:54:12 -0000

> >    Each key exchange method is implicitly registered by this document.
> >
> > The registration is not implicit; it's explicit in Section 7.  I suggest
> > removing "implicitly".
>
> It's implicit in that the registration is not producing a list of (md5 hash
> of OID) that are appended to the prefix and registered individually -- the
> prefix is being registered but not all the possible values that would go on
> the wire.

Then I'd prefer, "Each key exchange prefix is registered...," but it's
not a DISCUSS, so use good judgment.

b