Re: [Curdle] WG status

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Sun, 30 April 2017 18:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC191294EC for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OoUXqP1GepL6 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BB3E129540 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 88so53635275lfr.0 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:08:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=L74H5sNtf1C7FGF0tfespAApeMSAILllRVuy4yryoo4=; b=JE6Doyddmw8di+oQkksMLhaj12ZUtUgc6Hc0ax4yt61Pprc0SMwt1sNTkwFC5a8i83 XY/zA32guUUxb7r1cZ5F30Cd5tV4CZXaUVwvqaN93Evvpt3g07sSOdEgjsHEVIiIPMA1 MSiAnU4xBq13g8mCtiD9nzEtJWlx6pI7CFq6uhV1wy39srHu9ELRoQGhB3KUZPV4ohC1 SZfWeQhQr4uuodr9t/LGrkIbz/I9hydKh4aYlTO/XzEm6+3TZ0EZCDS3pG+QdIRyn48t h+mg575o5rnWU3fMsDq3viZitXDLHvh9qgXKl9Cyvyqn2HcTklCH2PWoZkePOT3ngBaR XocA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=L74H5sNtf1C7FGF0tfespAApeMSAILllRVuy4yryoo4=; b=Jr31L44ArKJAjJL+Q13MVSIWAULUfgCe5517+xSqp/UHHurKpgh8rwz/R5lgMBLCYs nwG9kaBi3Ms8LGt9T9K+LFMIgLy9ehTifTE3nCZsSitbbqLmLh77Rr3cs9Sno7i2ua+F y3WDAv4eXKDwyt66uFLsci/1aOM3UchnCaNahAu5hnh3SxYFaE98f6zZ/95wHFBYRY/V Jkj9PaoEfYvt0xQ0vXKMV8lIlxyDEDaEem1rKyfg44WVzIr2RXAr9oO3u0yC3HoGP+lW M85htOC8TN2YFAWAKwwBuN/Ha/URx/7FPKFMcVNBTbHzUa2dZkLFHHpDmRJZfrf98A1q zTTw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4OwMXpbau4cd+7qZF/Gk0yxmHQZtpuNqX5kJPP7wfraHR6N/UO tATcGNBwxiyWsGqSxlegDWPlrx0h3w==
X-Received: by 10.46.8.26 with SMTP id 26mr7652881lji.128.1493575718402; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mglt.ietf@gmail.com
Received: by 10.46.69.212 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 11:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTknNkAWHUeqk-BQqYU_6jTGVgPurhqF7=Am7Xk7OT=D-gQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADZyTkkd-JpsE89z=P10Y0esc1NCZydD5NqMTs8E5xUz-DMT_g@mail.gmail.com> <58F475B5.4090504@roumenpetrov.info> <CADPMZDBjgpzMKp1UJqWMC_xRZpfce=wOOsE51HwY2dEO73kKeA@mail.gmail.com> <CADPMZDBS3yFxWmioNRV+Vx-ThTPW636ydr1fz76vNP52DjAtZA@mail.gmail.com> <1778170c976e43569d34f051bba51f4c@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CADZyTknNkAWHUeqk-BQqYU_6jTGVgPurhqF7=Am7Xk7OT=D-gQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 14:08:37 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: VKRr0KkpVpymMhMggTGbmAws1Lo
Message-ID: <CADZyTk=3pZb40upVHPuG8hYEWOCpu2hhdyBpiZ9t5+v2_AYzAQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>, =?UTF-8?B?0KDRg9C80LXQvSDQn9C10YLRgNC+0LI=?= <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info>, curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045ec2da240237054e663271
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/fsKekDUFYJxhgXQzU0NEDWKbyQ4>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] WG status
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 18:10:35 -0000

Hi,

So far we have not received many inputs and I would like to make sure we
understand Romen's concern. My understanding of the concerned raised by
Romen is that specifying signature algorithms may complexity the ways
Public Key Algorithm registries are designated.  However it looks to me one
reason is that we are moving from implicit signature scheme to explicit
ones.

Romen please re-state your issues with the draft, clearly expose the issues
as well as the alternate you would fine acceptable.

Yours,
Daniel

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com
> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> We need some feed back to make sure we take the correct decision. Please
> continue the discussion.
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
>
> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your second note.
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone else agree with Roumen?  Please post by within a couple of
>> days, otherwise we will consider the issue closed.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies
>>
>> Member, OpenSSL Dev Team
>>
>> IM: richsalz@jabber.at Twitter: RichSalz
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Curdle mailing list
>> Curdle@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle
>>
>>
>