[Curdle] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09: (with COMMENT)
Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 06 August 2019 14:39 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietf.org
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B79E120226; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 07:39:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <daniel.migaultf@ericsson.com>, curdle-chairs@ietf.org, daniel.migaultf@ericsson.com, curdle@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.100.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Message-ID: <156510234996.19222.8394663725844648268.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 07:39:09 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/iTPqHlFpRTDUv-6pPOW8f7ji4HA>
Subject: [Curdle] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Aug 2019 14:39:17 -0000
Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ed25519-ed448/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- A few editorial nits: ** References in Section 3 – 7, 10 to [RFC4251], [RFC4253] and [RFC8032] are showing up in the format “[RFC#], Section x.x [RFC#]”. For example, “[RFC4253], Section 6.6 [RFC4253]”. It should likely only be “Section x.x [RFC#]”. ** Section 8. Typo. s/the the/the/ ** Section 8. Typo and making it be “an example”, not “the example”. s/the SSHFP Resource Record for the Ed448 public key with SHA-256 fingerprint would be example be /The SSHFP Resource Record for a Ed448 public key with a SHA-256 fingerprint would, for example, be/
- [Curdle] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ie… Roman Danyliw via Datatracker