Re: [Curdle] WG status

Румен Петров <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info> Mon, 17 April 2017 07:58 UTC

Return-Path: <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE62126C7B for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:58:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.101
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.101 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8eVVJiB8ST8K for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:58:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rila.superhosting.bg (rila.superhosting.bg [91.196.125.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D43E3124C27 for <curdle@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [78.128.48.21] (port=57320 helo=[192.168.0.10]) by rila.superhosting.bg with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info>) id 1d01Yb-003YaW-7P for curdle@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:58:45 +0300
Message-ID: <58F475B5.4090504@roumenpetrov.info>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 10:58:45 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?B?0KDRg9C80LXQvSDQn9C10YLRgNC+0LI=?= <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:33.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/33.0 SeaMonkey/2.30
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: curdle <curdle@ietf.org>
References: <CADZyTkkd-JpsE89z=P10Y0esc1NCZydD5NqMTs8E5xUz-DMT_g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTkkd-JpsE89z=P10Y0esc1NCZydD5NqMTs8E5xUz-DMT_g@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - rila.superhosting.bg
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - roumenpetrov.info
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: rila.superhosting.bg: authenticated_id: master78@roumenpetrov.info
X-Authenticated-Sender: rila.superhosting.bg: master78@roumenpetrov.info
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/kBPNWuZo9xJ4XBBps6VHcg5fC8w>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] WG status
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 07:58:51 -0000

Daniel Migault wrote:
> Hi,
>
> My understanding is that the WG has reached consensus over the 
> following drafts, and these drafts are ready to be sent to the IESG. 
> If you have any comments, feel free to provide them as soon as possible.
Consensus?
> draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ext-info-04 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-ext-info/>
Hmm,
"server-sig-algs" is misleading . It is designed against the current 
rules (RFC) that design "Public Key Algorithms"!


> [SNIP] 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-ssh-modp-dh-sha2/>
> draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2-05 
> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-rsa-sha2/>
Same here. In fact design is for new public key algorithm, but 
paragraphs state something different.

> [SNIP]
>
> Yours,
> Daniel
Regards,
Roumen Petrov