[Curdle] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-07: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 10 October 2017 23:18 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietf.org
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E8D134307; Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures@ietf.org, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, curdle-chairs@ietf.org, daniel.migault@ericsson.com, curdle@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.63.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150767748641.24759.5760552454791266636.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 16:18:06 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/lYTT06eijIH92Nlzx2SNkcgSwQE>
Subject: [Curdle] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:18:06 -0000

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-curdle-cms-eddsa-signatures/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 1.2:

   CMS values are generated using ASN.1 [X680], which uses the Basic
   Encoding Rules (BER) and the Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)
   [X690].

Recommend:

   CMS values are generated using ASN.1 [X680], using the Basic
   Encoding Rules (BER) and the Distinguished Encoding Rules (DER)
   [X690].

(Rationale: ASN.1 has many more encodings than this, and the original phrasing
implies that these are the only two.)

I'm a little surprised that there are no citations for Curve25519, Curve488,
and "Schnorr's signature system." If it is realistic add citations for these, I
believe it would be an improvement.