Re: [Curdle] WG status

Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com> Sun, 30 April 2017 19:57 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: curdle@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D88127866 for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=augustcellars.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5csKop6hWHpJ for <curdle@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail4.augustcellars.com (augustcellars.com [50.45.239.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FE7C1286CA for <curdle@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:55:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0087_01D2C1FC.7560E750"
Content-Language: en-us
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=augustcellars.com; s=winery; c=simple/simple; t=1493582152; h=from:subject:to:date:message-id; bh=NU5HT5DG5fiMBa8iPds7CfhmF0i8SQQQ88oeC7M52nM=; b=OP/D1IQpzw00nXh9B6msJGjU/gHLyGbbMN6CxvlFrjzkaEz/GdbiIgfGKp7x4iYPU4yV1OhxcF5 In/13s8Iybs4L2IVq62qE+X44bx9m1A0mjomkCY0sQgq4XXeQwgsaSJTRYMxlr/BberxOuLwHpYKc OT6HSaiZjzhKC05of3It28VGa/AW9OuIPdN8cGRDyxmjekSIRUGD0kwvJ9yPaf/x/6S4ZO2i8G+CZ 7vkh/8SC0a0tjrJtOfM4fIkjYtLtPVIDZ7eHV17JWys6yo7VSfrymmSJBlHMgqeY+VpxDumYi9Cnz 0PnY0ZsxrUDLSbdZmmhAiKy2VABZaUpY7Rng==
Received: from mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.201) by mail4.augustcellars.com (192.168.1.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:55:52 -0700
Received: from Hebrews (193.253.56.155) by mail2.augustcellars.com (192.168.0.56) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1263.5; Sun, 30 Apr 2017 12:55:41 -0700
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Daniel Migault' <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>, "'Salz, Rich'" <rsalz@akamai.com>
CC: 'curdle' <curdle@ietf.org>, 'denis bider' <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>, =?utf-8?B?J9Cg0YPQvNC10L0g0J/QtdGC0YDQvtCyJw==?= <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info>
References: <CADZyTkkd-JpsE89z=P10Y0esc1NCZydD5NqMTs8E5xUz-DMT_g@mail.gmail.com> <58F475B5.4090504@roumenpetrov.info> <CADPMZDBjgpzMKp1UJqWMC_xRZpfce=wOOsE51HwY2dEO73kKeA@mail.gmail.com> <CADPMZDBS3yFxWmioNRV+Vx-ThTPW636ydr1fz76vNP52DjAtZA@mail.gmail.com> <1778170c976e43569d34f051bba51f4c@ustx2ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CADZyTknNkAWHUeqk-BQqYU_6jTGVgPurhqF7=Am7Xk7OT=D-gQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADZyTk=3pZb40upVHPuG8hYEWOCpu2hhdyBpiZ9t5+v2_AYzAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADZyTk=3pZb40upVHPuG8hYEWOCpu2hhdyBpiZ9t5+v2_AYzAQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 21:55:15 +0200
Message-ID: <008601d2c1eb$b1d4e300$157ea900$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGTZ0fUgGkQr1IPWvip/Y8+bed1eQMIyCQpAX2S/R8CnsWL0wKDMDIzApe8sdgCseilSqHleOMw
X-Originating-IP: [193.253.56.155]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/curdle/nYqD1YplpToV4MlNHPjHnF4lbCQ>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] WG status
X-BeenThere: curdle@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "List for discussion of potential new security area wg." <curdle.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/curdle/>
List-Post: <mailto:curdle@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle>, <mailto:curdle-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2017 19:57:55 -0000

Given that we are talking about ssh – I do not have any opinion at this time.  I have never implemented nor really used ssh w/o an intermediary

 

Jim

 

 

From: Curdle [mailto:curdle-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Migault
Sent: Sunday, April 30, 2017 8:09 PM
To: Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com>
Cc: curdle <curdle@ietf.org>rg>; denis bider <denisbider.ietf@gmail.com>om>; Румен Петров <pkixssh@roumenpetrov.info>
Subject: Re: [Curdle] WG status

 

Hi, 

So far we have not received many inputs and I would like to make sure we understand Romen's concern. My understanding of the concerned raised by Romen is that specifying signature algorithms may complexity the ways Public Key Algorithm registries are designated.  However it looks to me one reason is that we are moving from implicit signature scheme to explicit ones. 

Romen please re-state your issues with the draft, clearly expose the issues as well as the alternate you would fine acceptable.

Yours, 

Daniel 

 

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 4:54 PM, Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com <mailto:daniel.migault@ericsson.com> > wrote:

Hi everyone, 

We need some feed back to make sure we take the correct decision. Please continue the discussion.  

Yours, 

Daniel

 

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:45 AM, Salz, Rich <rsalz@akamai.com <mailto:rsalz@akamai.com> > wrote:

Thanks for your second note.

 

Does anyone else agree with Roumen?  Please post by within a couple of days, otherwise we will consider the issue closed.

 

--  

Senior Architect, Akamai Technologies

Member, OpenSSL Dev Team

IM: richsalz@jabber.at <mailto:richsalz@jabber.at>  Twitter: RichSalz

 

 

_______________________________________________
Curdle mailing list
Curdle@ietf.org <mailto:Curdle@ietf.org> 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/curdle