[cuss] "Standard Action" ratification consensus for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 28 April 2014 13:38 UTC
Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E800A1A0A22 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:38:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8a-rKHt7_gHj for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7589C1A0A20 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 06:38:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.12]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s3SDcpQo026651 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:38:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail4.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id s3SDcpSR018608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:38:51 -0500
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id s3SDcpPp008247 for <cuss@ietf.org.>; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:38:51 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <535E5A5D.60008@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 08:40:45 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.12
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cuss/EEUC1E-wok9LaYvQe47tPu0J4BI
Subject: [cuss] "Standard Action" ratification consensus for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:38:55 -0000
Folks: A word of thanks to all those that expressed an interest in the thread we opened up for the ratification of "Standards Action" guideline for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui [1]. The balance of the views expressed on the topic appear to be to keep the draft at Standards Action for new packages so we can control the use of the mechanism. We need to inform the IESG that this is the choice of the WG, as conservative as it may be. For now, this choice will be in effect and may be revisited in the future. Alissa (as AD) will follow up with the IESG to get the draft moving ahead. [1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00592.html Cheers, Vijay K. Gurbani and Enrico Marocco.
- [cuss] "Standard Action" ratification consensus f… Vijay K. Gurbani