[cuss] WGLC done for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn; next steps

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 15:16 UTC

Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B871AE08D for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:16:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.001
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpK8GyF0xRF3 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail2.lucent.com (ihemail2.lucent.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2B9D1A1F65 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:16:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com []) by ihemail2.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id rB2FG3bw013994 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:16:03 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com []) by usnavsmail3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id rB2FG2TH024755 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:16:03 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com []) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id rB2FG2o9011360 for <cuss@ietf.org.>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:16:02 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <529CA43D.3090900@bell-labs.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:16:13 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cuss@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on
Subject: [cuss] WGLC done for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn; next steps
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:16:18 -0000


The WGLC for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn is now over.

Below is my personal interpretation of where the matter stands, i.e.,
what I write below is not written as a co-chair but rather to determine
if the WG agree that this is where matters now stand.  Please comment
if I deviate from what you all agree.

- "isdn-network" is tacitly supported, but not overtly so.

- More specifically, "isdn-network" is not IANA registered, and all
   text related to it is not normative.

- The addition of the Note uses non-normative language, i.e.,

      "The 'isdn-interwork' value for purpose parameter was used
      in Internet-Drafts that have led to the publication of the
      present RFC. Although these documents had no other status than
      "work in progress", this value is implemented by some vendors.
      Therefore, it is recommended to support parsing and interpreting
      'isdn-interwork' the same way as 'isdn-uui' when receiving

Is this an accurate representation?

Now back with the co-chair hat on ...

There has been reviews of the draft [1,2,3] by key WG members.  Can the
draft authors please comment on next steps with respect to revising the
draft.  Enrico and I will start the shepherding step in parallel to the
revision to be submitted.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00531.html
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00539.html
[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00522.html


- vijay
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq