[cuss] WGLC done for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn; next steps

["Vijay K. Gurbani" <[e-mail]>]

Folks:

The WGLC for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-isdn is now over.

Below is my personal interpretation of where the matter stands, i.e.,
what I write below is not written as a co-chair but rather to determine
if the WG agree that this is where matters now stand.  Please comment
if I deviate from what you all agree.

- "isdn-network" is tacitly supported, but not overtly so.

- More specifically, "isdn-network" is not IANA registered, and all
   text related to it is not normative.

- The addition of the Note uses non-normative language, i.e.,

      "The 'isdn-interwork' value for purpose parameter was used
      in Internet-Drafts that have led to the publication of the
      present RFC. Although these documents had no other status than
      "work in progress", this value is implemented by some vendors.
      Therefore, it is recommended to support parsing and interpreting
      'isdn-interwork' the same way as 'isdn-uui' when receiving
      messages."

Is this an accurate representation?

Now back with the co-chair hat on ...

There has been reviews of the draft [1,2,3] by key WG members.  Can the
draft authors please comment on next steps with respect to revising the
draft.  Enrico and I will start the shepherding step in parallel to the
revision to be submitted.

[1] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00531.html
[2] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00539.html
[3] http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/current/msg00522.html

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [e-mail]
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq