Re: [cuss] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10

Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Mon, 27 January 2014 13:29 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B04641A0213; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fukego9Uc0EO; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22c.google.com (mail-pd0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D6F21A020E; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pd0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p10so5717236pdj.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:29:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=AEqX5waXIlRUAG/JnS/qqraFYulwql7A1AFeryhnnoU=; b=gK+ZCXSKAS63gpeZsTnfVcSY70/g8aLOnmmbAHxXJ4DTuM93JWZLGOEaJ41m3NK19E ifP13O3sJX/qdiyNIm3nzAgTnIV0qHKyuIm+Gk5icDtOiv8Zah0FjJf7SF13tb2IACGJ gmb6BImzwC88UW67YrLSv8eFUCd3jD3rf27BoDvJl7ydthzEcURNWYCPNgEmj9h2ayMz 9SQLQLm6pTlaSZhrGgPUGX2N6aiiDd+Ewxzzh1OA4UHv1T+6z5QGNfO49gtuElt1frHO wEKW+nJgHr04EIA2+RZLcra6EGA6nddQ4Hz+3MP1DdfGw4M5iwg6WDxkJdAsbIPxC/Zz /qJQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.66.188.203 with SMTP id gc11mr29882894pac.63.1390829334072; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:28:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.68.168.132 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Jan 2014 05:28:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <519920BA.9040308@joelhalpern.com>
References: <5195550A.3000608@nostrum.com> <519920BA.9040308@joelhalpern.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 07:28:53 -0600
Message-ID: <CAKhHsXHpOKaCb5M1j=H=j8z+dDsWtuKXmK_vFE9qsKSKv3mAEQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bf0c66466bdf204f0f3b0b0
Cc: gen-art@ietf.org, draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-all@tools.ietf.org, "cuss@ietf.org" <cuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [cuss] [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 13:29:04 -0000

Joel,

Thanks for your review of the document.  We have made the changes you
suggested in your review in the -12 version.

     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-12.txt

Let us know if there are any other issues.

- Alan -


On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>wrote;wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>
> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>
> Document: draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui-10
>     A Mechanism for Transporting User to User
>         Call Control Information in SIP
> Reviewer: Joel M. Halpern
> Review Date: 19-May-2013
> IETF LC End Date: 29-May-2013
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>
> Summary: This document is nearly ready for publication as a Proposed
> Standard
>
> Major issues:
>
> Minor issues:
>     The requirements discussions for redirection and referral (second
> paragraph of section 3, in regards REQ-3) includes what appears to be
> normative requirements on redirecting devices.
> a) This would seem to belong in section 4 on Normative Definition.
> b) It would seem that there ought to be some discussion of what happens
> with redirecting devices that do not understand this new UUI. (I presume
> things work, but I don't see how.)
>
> Nits/editorial comments:
>     In section 8.2, given that this is a WG document, should the "the
> authors believe" actually be "the WG believes"?  Or even, given IETF rough
> consensus on this document, "the IETF believes"?
> _______________________________________________
> cuss mailing list
> cuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss
>