Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network"
"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> Thu, 21 November 2013 19:01 UTC
Return-Path: <vkg@bell-labs.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A9E1AE265 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:01:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLA8xtDno_if for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ihemail1.lucent.com (ihemail1.lucent.com [135.245.0.33]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4DF1AE262 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 11:01:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.10]) by ihemail1.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id rALJ0uFo025112 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:00:56 -0600 (CST)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (umail.ndc.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by usnavsmail2.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/GMO) with ESMTP id rALJ0un0026757 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:00:56 -0600
Received: from shoonya.ih.lucent.com (shoonya.ih.lucent.com [135.185.237.229]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id rALJ0tWs003651; Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:00:56 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <528E5869.7080905@bell-labs.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 13:00:57 -0600
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>
Organization: Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew Allen <aallen@blackberry.com>, "bruno.chatras@orange.com" <bruno.chatras@orange.com>, "cuss@ietf.org" <cuss@ietf.org>
References: <5281161C.1060404@bell-labs.com> <17974_1384966290_528CE892_17974_4141_1_88CAD1D4E8773F42858B58CAA28272A0112D245F@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338E677A4@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <528E4204.8080304@bell-labs.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338E679F8@XMB104ADS.rim.net>
In-Reply-To: <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338E679F8@XMB104ADS.rim.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.33
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 135.3.39.10
Subject: Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network"
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2013 19:01:06 -0000
On 11/21/2013 11:40 AM, Andrew Allen wrote: > Vijay > > I don't think we are talking about applying this to the nth degree I > think we are simply recognizing that in this case there are deployed > systems out there that we ought to attempt to interoperate with if > that can relatively easily be achieved.. > > I am not sure it complicates the parser greatly to have two possible > tokens (A or B) as the value of a parameter and then in the call > processing logic have an if A or B statement. Andrew: If you look at the SIP grammar, this obviously will not be the only header with multiple representations. We simply keep on adding to that list. Beyond that, I think discussing about this to a great degree will not lead us anywhere. I am interested in this issue from an academic point of view, but pragmatism says that we proceed further without delays. As an individual, I am happy to allow the draft to proceed with the alias defined (or not). Thanks, - vijay -- Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent 1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA) Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/ | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Andrew Allen
- [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" bruno.chatras
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Andrew Allen
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Christer Holmberg
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Atle Monrad
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Christer Holmberg
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" bruno.chatras
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Belling, Thomas (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" R.Jesske
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" bruno.chatras
- Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network" Atle Monrad