IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network"

Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Sat, 23 November 2013 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DB31AE111 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 06:21:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.85
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.85 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3C5cb4F4Tx3Q for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 06:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailgw1.ericsson.se (mailgw1.ericsson.se [193.180.251.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0191AE0AC for <cuss@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 06:21:35 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-b7f1c8e000005ceb-2e-5290b9e729e8
Received: from ESESSHC012.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw1.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id BF.24.23787.7E9B0925; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:21:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB209.ericsson.se ([169.254.9.73]) by ESESSHC012.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.54]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 15:21:26 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com>, "cuss@ietf.org" <cuss@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network"
Thread-Index: AQHO3wTzIOLVm0h/9UaRh+s6U64K8JouUrUAgAF8FQCAAB+7AIAABCiAgAAWioCAAYtzgIAABZoAgAFUYgKAAAHmAg==
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:21:25 +0000
Message-ID: <7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C5530C3@ESESSMB209.ericsson.se>
References: <5281161C.1060404@bell-labs.com> <17974_1384966290_528CE892_17974_4141_1_88CAD1D4E8773F42858B58CAA28272A0112D245F@PEXCVZYM12.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338E677A4@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <528E4204.8080304@bell-labs.com> <BBF5DDFE515C3946BC18D733B20DAD2338E679F8@XMB104ADS.rim.net> <528E5869.7080905@bell-labs.com> <7D2F7D7ADBA812449F25F4A69922881C209134@ESESSMB203.ericsson.se>, <528FA8D6.8050301@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <528FA8D6.8050301@bell-labs.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.147]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_7594FB04B1934943A5C02806D1A2204B1C5530C3ESESSMB209erics_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrELMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre7znROCDPa1SVrcaH/BbNGwRs6B yaPvsovHkiU/mQKYorhsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyps/9wlLwV6Fi1t35bA2Mp6W7GDk5JARMJP5f XMUMYYtJXLi3nq2LkYtDSOAQo8TBpt1MEM5iRolpn/qAqjg42AQsJLr/aYM0iAh4S0x9+p8V xBYGGtSwZQUzRNxUorvlHxuEnSWx79EPdhCbRUBV4tnuF2A1vAK+EgsvzIeaf5FZ4sepNrBB nAK6ElevNYMVMQJd9P3UGiYQm1lAXOLWk/lMEJcKSCzZcx7qalGJl4//sYLcJiGgJDFtaxpE eb5E/7SljBC7BCVOznzCMoFRZBaSSbOQlM1CUgYR15O4MXUKG4StLbFs4WtmCFtXYsa/Q1A1 1hK/HyxkRFazgJFjFSN7bmJmTnq54SZGYDwd3PJbdwfjqXMihxilOViUxHk/vHUOEhJITyxJ zU5NLUgtii8qzUktPsTIxMEp1cA4eYpZ3V1v63VNvLynnewOKdzWCfp4T3GylHVPsf4FQ2c1 u93xXlUXo+qDdt1rFjrn/LrFgdfxUMI9ORWOz7usr8wIqn84p/TOGl8DHtFT1hY/Nt29JpUS f3wmj1pQ94z1BY4t74JObXoWY/VTzf2EsHecWZueX+xP+9e1ZbWMej1mzlsOaSuxFGckGmox FxUnAgC+AT2zdQIAAA==
Subject: Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network"
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 14:21:37 -0000

Hi,

I already gave some comments, but in case the outcome was clear: I think we should move the draft forward.

Existing entities that implement the old value will anyway have to be updated to support the new value. And, if new entities will have to support the old value, I am sure the buyer will inform the vendor about that :)

Regards,

Christer






From: cuss [cuss-bounces@ietf.org] on behalf of Vijay K. Gurbani [vkg@bell-labs.com]
Sent: Friday, 22 November 2013 8:56 PM
To: cuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [cuss] "isdn-uui" versus "isdn-network"


On 11/22/2013 12:36 PM, Atle Monrad wrote:
> Hi
>
> I guess each of the "shall we allow multiple representations" needs
> to be handled on a case-by-case basis, but generally speaking I
> understand that the chairs and ADs aren't too enthusiastic with too
> many ...
>
> What 3GPP really wants for Christmas is the draft to be completed.
> Somebody must take a decision on this soon.

... which means that by Nov 29, 2013 it'd be nice to hear from others
who have an opinion.

Many thanks to those who have already expressed one.

Cheers,

- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
_______________________________________________
cuss mailing list
cuss@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email