Re: [cuss] Ratification of "Standards Action" guideline for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui

Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> Mon, 14 April 2014 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <alissa@cooperw.in>
X-Original-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650461A06C1 for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wHqiunA_pczz for <cuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E7C41A069E for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id A45C020992 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:34:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:34:26 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cooperw.in; h=date :subject:from:to:message-id:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mesmtp; bh=E/vVhceQ3k If6NjD07mKSw92koc=; b=embaAlHjrP0CTSA8nJsGPo5Lu7LTYjrFTWjwj3nYr/ GaJHlRHplvnj4GhLRwU7PkNIYYxu64HzssmTt6Li9/rUwcNtE1XcBDeqyZJLnylZ iMmxM9Ja33txRDZ9rEeQrNYz7EVZ+i3cVD5z3AuHGrJDq53nt/Qn4GktQTTQxDqo s=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:subject:from:to:message-id :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; s=smtpout; bh=E/vVhceQ3kIf6NjD07mKSw 92koc=; b=ZPbkxsF9jf8iZMZOdxqXS2lp2QtqUkoX5VxBBzCLGdCJ/HQ4T3eifO yFbkSvYRvgdgVCf+r6jq3I6dbNslIp1WKI1jLKJpx0vTtdcPgpF9di1sgFURzb3A 7NzwxV4w00zsp7aljD0zl1FTWfDJksVkjdhgci1+7q5AJgZmuD++o=
X-Sasl-enc: 1je/HEuqdpi6JXMHtpjY79QsGG7RZvnLNKETUBItllQ6 1397496866
Received: from [171.68.18.132] (unknown [171.68.18.132]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 96E846800C7 for <cuss@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 13:34:24 -0400 (EDT)
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 10:34:21 -0700
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: <cuss@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <CF7169EA.33798%alissa@cooperw.in>
Thread-Topic: [cuss] Ratification of "Standards Action" guideline for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui
References: <533DDDE5.9030101@bell-labs.com>
In-Reply-To: <533DDDE5.9030101@bell-labs.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cuss/zlbb8yvrC4aVbBhVVuPajtYWOC0
Subject: Re: [cuss] Ratification of "Standards Action" guideline for draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui
X-BeenThere: cuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Call Control UUI for SIP \(cuss\) working group discussion list" <cuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cuss/>
List-Post: <mailto:cuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss>, <mailto:cuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 17:34:37 -0000

There have not been many responses to Vijay¹s request below. Please send
your opinion to this list, even if it is ³no changes needed.²

Thanks,
Alissa

On 4/3/14, 3:17 PM, "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@bell-labs.com> wrote:

>All: The IESG has sent draft-ietf-cuss-sip-uui to the WG to ratify the
>"Standards Action" guideline for defining UUI packages and registering
>new IANA elements for the parameter tables for purpose, encoding and
>content.
>
>The draft authors note that the original concern when the work
>was coming out of Dispatch was that the UUI not become a "wildcard"
>header to be used for a wide variety of purposes.  Hence the direction
>toward requiring a standards track RFC.  However, a lesser standard
>such as "Specification Required" might suffice and offer more
>flexibility for additional use cases, while not opening up the process
>totally as would be the case for "First Come First Serve."
>
>The IESG will like to revisit this decision to confirm that the WG
>decisions remains "Standards Action".
>
>To that end, Enrico and I will like to open up a 2-week period to ratify
>this decision to remain at "Standards Action" or to move to something
>other designation.
>
>The 2-week period ends on close of business (US Central Time) April 17,
>2014.  Please express an opinion; if you are for keeping status quo,
>please send a one-liner to the cuss WG mailing list.  If you are of the
>opinion that we should relax the burden, please state so and a short
>reason on why we should do so.
>
>Thank you all.
>
>- vijay
>-- 
>Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
>1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60563 (USA)
>Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / vijay.gurbani@alcatel-lucent.com
>Web: http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/  | Calendar: http://goo.gl/x3Ogq
>
>_______________________________________________
>cuss mailing list
>cuss@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cuss