[Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1191720] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (cwt)

Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org> Wed, 24 March 2021 23:53 UTC

Return-Path: <iana-shared@icann.org>
X-Original-To: cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCAA3A1259 for <cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:53:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.628
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.628 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ah7KCKspZJuk for <cwt-reg-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.lax.icann.org (smtp.lax.icann.org [192.0.33.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C5E33A1255 for <cwt-reg-review@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 16:53:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from request4.lax.icann.org (request1.lax.icann.org [10.32.11.221]) by smtp.lax.icann.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFCEE3546; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:53:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by request4.lax.icann.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6C38220485; Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:53:00 +0000 (UTC)
RT-Owner: amanda.baber
From: Amanda Baber via RT <drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org>
Reply-To: drafts-expert-review-comment@iana.org
In-Reply-To: <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615947069-996.1191720-9-0@icann.org>
References: <RT-Ticket-1191720@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615946705-1571.1191720-9-0@icann.org> <rt-4.4.3-22207-1615947069-996.1191720-9-0@icann.org>
Message-ID: <rt-4.4.3-15477-1616629980-435.1191720-9-0@icann.org>
X-RT-Loop-Prevention: IANA
X-RT-Ticket: IANA #1191720
X-Managed-BY: RT 4.4.3 (http://www.bestpractical.com/rt/)
X-RT-Originator: amanda.baber@icann.org
CC: cwt-reg-review@ietf.org, michael.jones@microsoft.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-RT-Original-Encoding: utf-8
Precedence: bulk
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:53:00 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cwt-reg-review/DGA5cHZMUvNXLx8wnaYtDxbQ-_0>
Subject: [Cwt-reg-review] [IANA #1191720] expert review for draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile-17 (cwt)
X-BeenThere: cwt-reg-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: CWT Registry Review <cwt-reg-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cwt-reg-review>, <mailto:cwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cwt-reg-review/>
List-Post: <mailto:cwt-reg-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cwt-reg-review>, <mailto:cwt-reg-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2021 23:53:05 -0000

Hi Mike,

Can you look at this one before tomorrow's IESG telechat?

thanks,

Amanda Baber
Lead IANA Services Specialist

On Wed Mar 17 02:11:09 2021, amanda.baber wrote:
> Hi Ludwig and Mike (cc: cwt-reg-review@ietf.org),
> 
> Are you available to review this document's CWT Confirmation Method
> registration request by Wednesday the 24th? The document is listed on
> next week's IESG agenda.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ace-oscore-profile
> 
> Let us know if you believe that we can mark the document "IANA OK" (or
> "Not OK") without waiting for the other reviewer.
> 
> This is the registration as it appears in the document:
> 
> 9.5.  CWT Confirmation Methods Registry
> 
> The following registration is done for the CWT Confirmation Methods
> Registry following the procedure specified in section 7.2.1 of
> [RFC8747]:
> 
> o  Confirmation Method Name: "osc"
> o  Confirmation Method Description: OSCORE_Input_Material carrying
>    the parameters for using OSCORE per-message security with implicit
>    key confirmation
> o  Confirmation Key: TBD (value between 4 and 255)
> o  Confirmation Value Type(s): map
> o  Change Controller: IESG
> o  Specification Document(s): Section 3.2.1 of [[this specification]]
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Amanda Baber
> Lead IANA Services Specialist