Re: [Dance] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-ietf-dance-00-01: (with COMMENT)
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 08 September 2021 16:24 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dance@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DB13A2D71;
Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:24:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id TXCn0Im9s-Ba; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:24:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7D43A2DDC;
Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACD83985D;
Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:30:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id bZaog5THfFVd; Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:30:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247])
by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85F03985B;
Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:30:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D9296B;
Wed, 8 Sep 2021 12:23:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Robert Wilton <rwilton@cisco.com>, "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>,
dance-chairs@ietf.org, dance@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <163110592446.355.15107144160207396197@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <163110592446.355.15107144160207396197@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0;
<'$9xN5Ub#
z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 12:23:53 -0400
Message-ID: <13172.1631118233@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dance/mmFMObHJWNostFzdj2FjJI_FN0I>
Subject: Re: [Dance] Robert Wilton's No Objection on
charter-ietf-dance-00-01: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dance@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DANE Authentication for Network Clients Everywhere <dance.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dance>,
<mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dance/>
List-Post: <mailto:dance@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dance>,
<mailto:dance-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2021 16:24:07 -0000
Robert Wilton via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote: > I'm wondering whether restricting the initial use case to TLS client > only will limit its usefulness in IOT onboarding? I don't think so. > Are the milestone dates correct (i.e., the architecture and use cases > is expected to be standardized after the solution)? To my mind, the documents should be finalized together. That doesn't mean that the WG can't do a WGLC on them prior to that. I suspect that they will form a cluster in the Q anyway, so might as well allow the WG to fix minutia. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
- [Dance] Robert Wilton's No Objection on charter-i… Robert Wilton via Datatracker
- Re: [Dance] Robert Wilton's No Objection on chart… Michael Richardson