[dane] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6698 (7975)

Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com> Sat, 08 June 2024 03:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ogud@ogud.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAF5C157915 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xMxxaNJxUfzX for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp122.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (smtp122.iad3a.emailsrvr.com [173.203.187.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5D48C14F73E for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 20:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Auth-ID: ogud@ogud.com
Received: by smtp16.relay.iad3a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: ogud-AT-ogud.com) with ESMTPSA id B9E3B59D6; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 23:50:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Olafur Gudmundsson <ogud@ogud.com>
Message-Id: <7ED88306-05F0-4684-8782-44559FF17BA7@ogud.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C7B11C1D-A494-4D59-BF68-BA4357B5B4D1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 23:50:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <ZmPFvvdj5DWO49Ko@chardros.imrryr.org>
To: Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org>
References: <20240607210819.87553204E22@rfcpa.rfc-editor.org> <ZmPFvvdj5DWO49Ko@chardros.imrryr.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
X-Classification-ID: 4d6b7bd8-61ca-4bce-ac5c-0aeaee37d7f4-1-1
Message-ID-Hash: KPUZWYDXYSEBT3VA4366GG6UUFVJVV4C
X-Message-ID-Hash: KPUZWYDXYSEBT3VA4366GG6UUFVJVV4C
X-MailFrom: ogud@ogud.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-dane.ietf.org-0; header-match-dane.ietf.org-1; header-match-dane.ietf.org-2; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, debcooley1@gmail.com, paul.wouters@aiven.io, prod@currently.com, dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [dane] Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6698 (7975)
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/-BHfxEz9GvSsXbPcnq3x9puNJ54>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:dane-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:dane-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dane-leave@ietf.org>

Like Victor says Reject as this is a spam errata filing

> On Jun 7, 2024, at 10:45 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <ietf-dane@dukhovni.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:08:19PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote:
> 
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6698,
>> "The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer
>> Security (TLS) Protocol: TLSA".
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7975
>> 
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: PJI <prod@currently.com>
>> 
>> Section: GLOBAL
>> 
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> unlicense 
>> 
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> unlicense 
>> 
>> Notes
>> -----
>> 2119
> 
> Neither "unlicense" (USA spelling), nor "unlicence" (much of of the rest
> of the English speaking world) appear in the document, and the erratum,
> as proposed, is a NOOP.  The word "License" (US), appears only in the
> RFC2119 boilerplate text.  If the intent is to switch to non-USA
> spelling (works for me, but good luck with that!), I don't believe that
> doing that document by document as a "technical" erratum is a productive
> path forward.
> 
> The erratum should be rejected.
> 
> -- 
>    Viktor.