Re: [dane] Need some feed back

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

[ - a bunch of addresses on the CC list ]

DANE / Pradeep,

I manually approved this posting - I would like to note that this, like the
previous email, is off-topic for the DANE list.

Pradeep, you have been warned against this sort of behavior on other
mailing lists (as an example,
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/GbUL8XxChNjU3zDpI3l-1JTP8tI ). As
one of the DANE mailing list administrators, I'm providing a warning here
as well - off-topic posts are not appropriate, and I will be moderating
future off-topic posts.

Sorry,
W



On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 3:50 PM Pradeep Kumar Xplorer <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> I described a need in the document.I pioneered browser usage since 1992
> just like if i was able to get an ovaltine in the morning by shops knowing
> my needs i and therefore many was given better and better browser
> experiences, i was an Ex SUN employee worked as software engineer in
> offices
> and in a 40 hour sitting schedule that compressed my back and since 1998 i
> have been to yoga fitness studios.SUN did not pay me Options or it was
> stolen and with some meagre 80000 dollars i had while in MountainView 2004
> as a resident of Stierlin apartments alone without any woman or biological
> children i registered dhyanayoga.info and started publishing as a yoga
> guide. The money that was held by company accountants or banks  due to me
> was not given to me. I publish dhyanayoga.info and explodingmoon.org and
> pradeepkumarxplorer.com as an individual.Todate i dont know who the
> viewers
> are nor have email contact or phone contact with them and i am victim of
> theft of subscriber help or value of IP of my website which can be easily
> ten billion dollars cash enough to lead a retired life in California owning
> a property like jenner vacation rentals and staying there. Instead of being
> able to enjoy my subscribers help and be a retired yoga body works
> practitioner
> - I was harmed and detained by Thai and US Immigration detentions
> - The thieves used a US CBP Fabregas romeo to harass me at airport April 8
> 2008 and forced me to sign a I-407 and siezed my permanent resident card.
> - The thieves attacked me since Jan 2010 many times using low class
> palakkad criminals and kerala police  and detained me in hospitals and
> destroyed and
> injured my yoga body.
> - The thieves are using ATM cards issued in my name
> - I have no one in my life i am a naturalised californian naturalised
> thailand who has been forcefully separated from both worlds to prevent
> me fathering a child so some cousins and their children can steal this
> ten billion dollars as family inheritance.
>
> SO these are the sufferings me as webhosting webserver customer is having
> because of lack of a standard that enforces Weblogs have either Internet
> Unique names or DeviceMacs. I am just one body anyone can download the
> document draft update their names and modify and upload it to Create an
> acceptible Draft RFC. WHy it is not happening is the question which lingers
> in me.
>
>
> On Fri, March 8, 2019 10:19 am, Paul Wouters wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 Mar 2019, Pradeep Kumar Xplorer wrote:
> >
> >
> > Pradeep,
> >
> >
> >> Subject: [dane] Need some feed back
> >>
> >>
> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xplorer-device-association/
> >>
> >
> > There are a number of fundamental problems with your document.
> >
> >
> > First, the document seems to want to tie together and manage protocol
> > identifiers from a slew of technologies and industry standard groups.
> That
> >  is not something that the IETF can dictate in an RFC.
> >
> > Second, it was send to the dane list, but I see nothing related to DANE
> > or DNSSEC. simiarly, the non-WG hasmat list also seems to be the wrong
> > place for this discussion, as that is specificly about HTTP only. I have
> > set the reply-to to the generic [e-mail] to prevent further
> followups
> > to end up in these wrong mailing lists.
> >
> > Third, you seem to be putting in personal anecdotal information of use
> > cases in a standards document where these do not belong.
> >
> > Fourth, you are implying to create a new globally unique identier that
> > is easy to remember in total free form, without any kind of
> specification.
> >
> >
> > If you want the IETF to look at your work, you need to separate all these
> >  issues in small defined chunks as see how or if they apply to the IETF
> at
> > all. Perhaps ICANN or ITU is a better fit for what you are looking for.
> >
> > Your document feels like a vague idea, not a specific protocol issue.
> > I recommend you brainstorm more about your ideas in general, and how
> > and where it fits into the world. See what is out there, and where it
> fits
> > in, and then write very specific drafts. A use case or overview or
> > architecture document, with a discussion about how current architectures
> > are not working. And only then start writing drafts that an implementer
> > could write code for without needing to make any architecture decisions.
> >
> > It would be good to also become more familiar with IETF and particupate
> > in more mailing list discussion before writing more drafts. Please see:
>
> No i dont have any income and being attacked for insisting i have my money.
> Criminals in palakkad using a mother and my websites are stealing and
> operating my money.I dont have time for following anyones rules and
> protocols expect i insist i know who my website viewers are, i have
> communication with them, they know i expect subscriber help, i am self
> employed that means my website is not the Creation of a group(I drank
> ovaltine today morning if they claim they are my group theres something
> fundamentally wrong with it) and that for last 15 years the cyber criminals
> exploiting me has isolated me and prevented me from living in my homeland
> of
> california.
> Theres nothing vague about my proposal.
> My weblogs should have Internet Unique identity that should be
> automatically billed and i should be able to expend that money using
> banking instruments
> i posess as an individual like an ATM.
> >
> > https://www.ietf.org/tao
> >
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf