Re: [dane] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Thu, 16 March 2017 11:42 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E82129404; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:42:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Up_4sr_hetd2; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D35D129405; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 04:42:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8268BE4D; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:42:51 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rYJC5iLXFNqw; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:42:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [10.87.48.75] (95-45-153-252-dynamic.agg2.phb.bdt-fng.eircom.net [95.45.153.252]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07578BE2E; Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:42:49 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1489664569; bh=4bcgk3UIzyZWo2SIYm0gbKm7Ye4AKg3hFRTOF8bUBb0=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=n0c8V7Q0yKEqWSh2wqEMNJJ+cIcejqAOAOs9CncvVtvP0YWDyboUu9EzTvd4BXQ1m W3ZGprnBHNUg0X+0v5a1KzmEqEoCv4uykHANu1zPIRwKAbvWUF9NfdmrnNqRJx9rSj 0SO6mY4fgpKYruoG5RWRoxrB87y9zA3Jjk4IfUiM=
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <148963019657.14225.13317445344804850643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: dane-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dane-smime@ietf.org, ogud@ogud.com, dane@ietf.org
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <b0f5fd42-e907-61d7-0494-f7bd24e8340c@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:42:48 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <148963019657.14225.13317445344804850643.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9WODLmQbjlJVIth2HAGA5mnF4p6Qx5IVU"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/2Jq97wABH-KTECIAJOaUeQpKcp0>
Subject: Re: [dane] Ben Campbell's No Objection on draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 11:42:59 -0000

Hi Ben,

On 16/03/17 02:09, Ben Campbell wrote:
> Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-dane-smime-15: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-smime/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> There's a rather icky IPR disclosure that basically says that licensing
> terms won't be disclosed until they see where the draft is going. 

Yeah, this same "tell ya later, maybe" situation has hit other
drafts in the last year or so, regrettably from the same source.

Fully agreeing about the icckiness, I did explicitly ask about this
in my AD review [1] and we gave participants a week or so to object
to progressing and none did as you can see from that thread.

Cheers,
S.


[1] https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/current/msg08511.html

> The
> shepherd's review doesn't mention whether the working group discussed
> that. Since this is experimental, it probably doesn't matter very much
> right now. I hope that gets some discussion prior to any attempt to
> promote this work to standards track.
> 
>