Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Wed, 03 October 2012 18:31 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BC921F85B8 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjn3xQcTpKZ6 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net (smtp3.pacifier.net [64.255.237.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260D21F8566 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tobias (winery.augustcellars.com [206.212.239.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBF8A38F1C; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Warren Kumari' <warren@kumari.net>, 'Ondrej Surý' <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>, 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz> <FBCB9053-91C3-4EBC-874E-97067A922E49@nic.cz> <C73CE37F-C34D-4824-AF11-D03F14AE3015@kumari.net> <EC95632A-306A-4E15-8857-667B47B1B92C@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <EC95632A-306A-4E15-8857-667B47B1B92C@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:29:47 -0700
Message-ID: <00cd01cda195$11b1dac0$35159040$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIEYFY/VCUy0gVjvT3yNECkGOm9TgGoEocpAaVfyiUBhk9HgZcTy1AQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'dane WG list' <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:31:14 -0000
> -----Original Message----- > From: dane-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dane-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Warren Kumari > Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:06 AM > To: Ondrej Surý; Stephen Farrell > Cc: dane WG list > Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? > > > On Sep 30, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote: > > > > > On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote: > > > >> More specifically, we are going to cancel the session after Oct 4th unless > we hear from you that you want to meet and we have an agenda. > >> > > > > Apologies all -- due to the contention for meeting slots and the difficulty of > scheduling all these slots we are moving the cutoff to the 2nd. > > > > And sadly enough it looks like we should cancel this slot. > > I am very grateful to folk, Dan especially for wanting to meet, and for being > interested in driving adoption, but it simply looks like we will not have a full > enough schedule to justify using IETF meeting time�. > > We will try and spend some time (finally) getting the new charter organized, > and also discuss deployment, etc� > > Just to be clear -- DANE WILL NOT BE MEETING IN DALLAS�. That is good, the IETF is meeting in Atlanta Jim > > W > > > > W > > > > > >> O. > >> > >> On 23. 9. 2012, at 12:28, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote: > >> > >>> Dear WG, > >>> > >>> we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of > the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite > unsure if there's enough interest in meeting. > >>> > >>> I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for > next year. > >>> > >>> Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda > item suggestion :))? > >>> > >>> O. > >>> -- > >>> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer > >>> ------------------------------------------- > >>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratore CZ.NIC > >>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic > >>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ > >>> tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 > >>> ------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> dane mailing list > >>> dane@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > >> > >> -- > >> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer > >> ------------------------------------------- > >> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- Laboratore CZ.NIC > >> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic > >> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz http://nic.cz/ > >> tel:+420.222745110 fax:+420.222745112 > >> ------------------------------------------- > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> dane mailing list > >> dane@ietf.org > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > > > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > dane@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
- [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Ondřej Surý
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet or no… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… SM
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Paul Hoffman
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Daniel Piggott
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Jim Schaad
- Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet? Warren Kumari
- Re: [dane] Deployment focus? Re: IETF 85 - meet o… Dan York