Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?

"Jim Schaad" <ietf@augustcellars.com> Wed, 03 October 2012 18:31 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@augustcellars.com>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BC921F85B8 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.148, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_23=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cjn3xQcTpKZ6 for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp3.pacifier.net (smtp3.pacifier.net [64.255.237.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260D21F8566 for <dane@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Tobias (winery.augustcellars.com [206.212.239.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: schaad@nwlink.com) by smtp3.pacifier.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBF8A38F1C; Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jim Schaad <ietf@augustcellars.com>
To: 'Warren Kumari' <warren@kumari.net>, 'Ondrej Surý' <ondrej.sury@nic.cz>, 'Stephen Farrell' <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <BD9F1901-911A-49EB-9390-B18D8A9D0B30@nic.cz> <FBCB9053-91C3-4EBC-874E-97067A922E49@nic.cz> <C73CE37F-C34D-4824-AF11-D03F14AE3015@kumari.net> <EC95632A-306A-4E15-8857-667B47B1B92C@kumari.net>
In-Reply-To: <EC95632A-306A-4E15-8857-667B47B1B92C@kumari.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 11:29:47 -0700
Message-ID: <00cd01cda195$11b1dac0$35159040$@augustcellars.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQIEYFY/VCUy0gVjvT3yNECkGOm9TgGoEocpAaVfyiUBhk9HgZcTy1AQ
Content-Language: en-us
Cc: 'dane WG list' <dane@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2012 18:31:14 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dane-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dane-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Warren Kumari
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2012 11:06 AM
> To: Ondrej Surý; Stephen Farrell
> Cc: dane WG list
> Subject: Re: [dane] IETF 85 - meet or not to meet?
> 
> 
> On Sep 30, 2012, at 5:00 AM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Sep 24, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote:
> >
> >> More specifically, we are going to cancel the session after Oct 4th unless
> we hear from you that you want to meet and we have an agenda.
> >>
> >
> > Apologies all -- due to the contention for meeting slots and the difficulty of
> scheduling all these slots we are moving the cutoff to the 2nd.
> >
> 
> And sadly enough it looks like we should cancel this slot.
> 
> I am very grateful to folk, Dan especially for wanting to meet, and for being
> interested in driving adoption, but it simply looks like we will not have a full
> enough schedule to justify using IETF meeting time�.
> 
> We will try and spend some time (finally) getting the new charter organized,
> and also discuss deployment, etc�
> 
> Just to be clear -- DANE WILL NOT BE MEETING IN DALLAS�.

That is good, the IETF is meeting in Atlanta

Jim

> 
> W
> 
> 
> > W
> >
> >
> >> O.
> >>
> >> On 23. 9. 2012, at 12:28, Ondrej Sur� <ondrej.sury@nic.cz> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Dear WG,
> >>>
> >>> we did register a slot for IETF 85 (just in case), but from the volume of
> the mailing list and just one WG draft (we have just adopted), we are quite
> unsure if there's enough interest in meeting.
> >>>
> >>> I am personally inclined of canceling this meeting and reschedule for
> next year.
> >>>
> >>> Any comments (if saying yes, please also say why and attach an agenda
> item suggestion :))?
> >>>
> >>> O.
> >>> --
> >>> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer
> >>> -------------------------------------------
> >>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratore CZ.NIC
> >>> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
> >>> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
> >>> tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
> >>> -------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> dane mailing list
> >>> dane@ietf.org
> >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ondrej Sur� -- Chief Science Officer
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --    Laboratore CZ.NIC
> >> Americka 23, 120 00 Praha 2, Czech Republic
> >> mailto:ondrej.sury@nic.cz    http://nic.cz/
> >> tel:+420.222745110       fax:+420.222745112
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> dane mailing list
> >> dane@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dane mailing list
> dane@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane