Re: [dane] Lukewarm discussion: DANE for opportunistic TLS protocols

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Fri, 14 February 2014 23:02 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dane@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 529AB1A029A for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:02:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxs3w3bU0A0a for <dane@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:02:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D3F1A00B5 for <dane@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 15:02:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aither.local (unknown [24.8.129.242]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BDA3D4010C; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:02:26 -0700 (MST)
Message-ID: <52FEA082.5090908@stpeter.im>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:02:26 -0700
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: James Cloos <cloos@jhcloos.com>, dane@ietf.org
References: <20140214200002.GK278@mournblade.imrryr.org> <m37g8x2trc.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
In-Reply-To: <m37g8x2trc.fsf@carbon.jhcloos.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dane/62uZz2lyoNwFRv10dfkfqQAG0Eg
Subject: Re: [dane] Lukewarm discussion: DANE for opportunistic TLS protocols
X-BeenThere: dane@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DNS-based Authentication of Named Entities <dane.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dane/>
List-Post: <mailto:dane@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane>, <mailto:dane-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 23:02:31 -0000

On 2/14/14, 3:50 PM, James Cloos wrote:

> The only real question is whether dane-srv and dane-smtp-with-dane
> should be published as two rfcs or combined into one?
> (I’m leaning towards two, numerically adjacent.)

IMHO we need two drafts, so that we properly cover non-SMTP technologies 
like IMAP and XMPP.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/